Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28587163›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

A Tox21 Approach to Altered Epigenetic Landscapes: Assessing Epigenetic Toxicity Pathways Leading to Altered Gene Expression and Oncogenic Transformation In Vitro.

Craig L Parfett, Daniel Desaulniers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Relationship to the Hallmarks of Cancer, Relevant Biomarkers, and Assays to Measure Them.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Good, the Bad and the Tick.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  12. Tumor Microenvironment and Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Craig L ParfettMechanistic Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau,HealthyEnvironments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, 50 Columbine Driveway,Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. craig.parfett@canada.ca.
Daniel DesaulniersHazard Identification Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau,HealthyEnvironments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, 50 Columbine Driveway,Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. daniel.desaulniers@canada.ca.
Health Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An emerging vision for toxicity testing in the 21st century foresees in vitro assays assuming the leading role in testing for chemical hazards, including testing for carcinogenicity. Toxicity will be determined by monitoring key steps in functionally validated molecular pathways, using tests designed to reveal chemically-induced perturbations that lead to adverse phenotypic endpoints in cultured human cells. Risk assessments would subsequently be derived from the causal in vitro endpoints and concentration vs. effect data extrapolated to human in vivo concentrations. Much direct experimental evidence now shows that disruption of epigenetic processes by chemicals is a carcinogenic mode of action that leads to altered gene functions playing causal roles in cancer initiation and progression. In assessing chemical safety, it would therefore be advantageous to consider an emerging class of carcinogens, the epigenotoxicants, with the ability to change chromatin and/or DNA marks by direct or indirect effects on the activities of enzymes (writers, erasers/editors, remodelers and readers) that convey the epigenetic information. Evidence is reviewed supporting a strategy for in vitro hazard identification of carcinogens that induce toxicity through disturbance of functional epigenetic pathways in human somatic cells, leading to inactivated tumour suppressor genes and carcinogenesis. In the context of human cell transformation models, these in vitro pathway measurements ensure high biological relevance to the apical endpoint of cancer. Four causal mechanisms participating in pathways to persistent epigenetic gene silencing were considered: covalent histone modification, nucleosome remodeling, non-coding RNA interaction and DNA methylation. Within these four interacting mechanisms, 25 epigenetic toxicity pathway components (SET1, MLL1, KDM5, G9A, SUV39H1, SETDB1, EZH2, JMJD3, CBX7, CBX8, BMI, SUZ12, HP1, MPP8, DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, TET1, MeCP2, SETDB2, BAZ2A, UHRF1, CTCF, HOTAIR and ANRIL) were found to have experimental evidence showing that functional perturbations played "driver" roles in human cellular transformation. Measurement of epigenotoxicants presents challenges for short-term carcinogenicity testing, especially in the high-throughput modes emphasized in the Tox21 chemicals testing approach. There is need to develop and validate in vitro tests to detect both, locus-specific, and genome-wide, epigenetic alterations with causal links to oncogenic cellular phenotypes. Some recent examples of cell-based high throughput chemical screening assays are presented that have been applied or have shown potential for application to epigenetic endpoints.

Indexed as

Carcinogenicity TestsEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsCarcinogensCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Transformation, NeoplasticDNA MethylationGene Expression RegulationGene SilencingHistonesHumansModels, BiologicalNucleosomesProtein BindingAdenosine TriphosphateCarcinogensCCCTC-Binding FactorHistonesNucleosomesRNA, Untranslatedcarcinogenesiscarcinogenicity testscarcinogenschemical safetychromatinDNA methylationenvironmental exposureepigenesisepigenomicsgene silencinghistonesneoplasmsnucleosomesrisk assessmenttumour suppressor

Identifiers

PMID28587163
PMCPMC5486002
OpenAlexW2620959040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.