Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28586949›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2017

Phase 1/2 Trial of 5-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5-mm Margins With Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial Glioblastoma: Health-Related Quality of Life Results.

Erqi L Pollom, Dylann Fujimoto, Jacob Wynne, Kira Seiger, Leslie A Modlin, Lisa R Jacobs, Melissa Azoulay, Rie von Eyben, Laurie Tupper, Iris C Gibbs and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Erqi L PollomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Dylann FujimotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Jacob WynneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Kira SeigerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Leslie A ModlinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Lisa R JacobsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Melissa AzoulayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Rie von EybenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Laurie TupperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Iris C GibbsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Steven L HancockDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Gordon LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Steven D ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
John R AdlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Griffith R HarshDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Ciara HarraherDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Seema NagpalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Reena P ThomasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Lawrence D RechtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Clara Y H ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California.
Scott G SoltysDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: sgsoltys@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationKL2TR001083 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001083NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR001636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe report a longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) treated on a prospective dose escalation trial of 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (25-40 Gy in 5 fractions) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide.

methodsHRQOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire core-30 (QLQ-C30) general, the EORTC quality of life questionnaire-brain cancer specific module (QLQ-BN20), and the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT). Questionnaires were completed at baseline and at every follow-up visit after completion of radiosurgery. Changes from baseline for 9 predefined HRQOL measures (global quality of life, physical functioning, social functioning, emotional functioning, motor dysfunction, communication deficit, fatigue, insomnia, and future uncertainty) were calculated at every time point.

resultsWith a median follow-up time of 10.4 months (range, 0.4-52 months), 139 total HRQOL questionnaires were completed by the 30 patients on trial. Compliance with HRQOL assessment was 76% at 12 months. Communication deficit significantly worsened over time, with a decline of 1.7 points per month (P=.008). No significant changes over time were detected in the other 8 scales of our primary analysis, including global quality of life. Although 8 patients (27%) experienced adverse radiation effects (ARE) on this dose escalation trial, it was not associated with a statistically significant decline in any of the primary HRQOL scales. Disease progression was associated with communication deficit, with patients experiencing an average worsening of 13.9 points per month after progression compared with 0.7 points per month before progression (P=.01).

conclusionOn this 5-fraction dose escalation protocol for newly diagnosed GBM, overall HRQOL remained stable and appears similar to historical controls of 30 fractions of radiation therapy. Tumor recurrence was associated with worsening communication deficit, and ARE did not correlate with a decline in HRQOL.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantCommunicationDacarbazineDisease ProgressionFemaleGlioblastomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID28586949
PMCPMC6193756
OpenAlexW2586458637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.