Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28586887›Full record

SynthesisJAMA2017

Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Maternal and Infant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Rebecca F Goldstein, Sally K Abell, Sanjeeva Ranasinha, Marie Misso, Jacqueline A Boyle, Mary Helen Black, Nan Li, Gang Hu, Francesco Corrado, Line Rode and 8 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 911 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
911citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05099900 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Exploration of Women's Experiences and Technology Usage Before, During, and After Pregnancy in Singapore

TypeobservationalSponsorNational University of SingaporeRan2021 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsPregnancy Related
NCT05295264 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Active Pregnancy. Mental and Emotional Health Care to Pregnant Woman During and After COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Politecnica de MadridRan2022 to 2025Enrolled500ConditionsMental Health Wellness, Emotional ProblemArmsModerate exercise program
NCT05518604 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Pregnancy, Active Duty and Weight Loss (PADaWL) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Dietary Intervention on Postpartum Weight Loss in Active Duty Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorTripler Army Medical CenterRan2024 to 2027Enrolled74ConditionsWeight Loss, Postpartum Weight RetentionArmsCounseling with goal of modifying eating behaviors
NCT06226597 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Fitbit Device Use in Overweight Pregnant Women to Improve Adherence to Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsPregnancy Weight Gain, Overweight and ObesityArmsFitbit device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

911 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

851 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Rebecca F GoldsteinMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Victoria, Australia2Monash Diabetes and Endocrine Units, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia.
Sally K AbellMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Victoria, Australia2Monash Diabetes and Endocrine Units, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia.
Sanjeeva RanasinhaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Marie MissoMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Jacqueline A BoyleMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Mary Helen BlackKaiser Permanente, Southern California, Los Angeles4Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California.
Nan LiTianjin Women's and Children's Health Center, Tianjin, China.
Gang HuPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Francesco CorradoUniversity Hospital, Messina, Italy.
Line RodeDepartment of Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Righospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Young Ju KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Margaretha HaugenNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Won O SongMichigan State University, East Lansing.
Min Hyoung KimDankook University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Annick BogaertsDepartment of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium14Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium15Faculty of Health and Social Work, Research Unit Healthy Living, UC Leuven-Limburg, Leuven, Belgium.
Roland DevliegerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium17Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Fertility, GZA Campus Sint-Augustinus, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Judith H ChungUniversity of California, Irvine.
Helena J TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Victoria, Australia2Monash Diabetes and Endocrine Units, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceBody mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain are increasing globally. In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) provided specific recommendations regarding the ideal gestational weight gain. However, the association between gestational weight gain consistent with theIOM guidelines and pregnancy outcomes is unclear.

objectiveTo perform a systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression to evaluate associations between gestational weight gain above or below the IOM guidelines (gain of 12.5-18 kg for underweight women [BMI <18.5]; 11.5-16 kg for normal-weight women [BMI 18.5-24.9]; 7-11 kg for overweight women [BMI 25-29.9]; and 5-9 kg for obese women [BMI ≥30]) and maternal and infant outcomes. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Search of EMBASE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, MEDLINE, and MEDLINE In-Process between January 1, 1999, and February 7, 2017, for observational studies stratified by prepregnancy BMI category and total gestational weight gain. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Odds ratios (ORs) and absolute risk differences (ARDs) per live birth were calculated using a random-effects model based on a subset of studies with available data. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth, and large for gestational age (LGA). Secondary outcomes were macrosomia, cesarean delivery, and gestational diabetes mellitus.

resultsOf 5354 identified studies, 23 (n = 1 309 136 women) met inclusion criteria. Gestational weight gain was below or above guidelines in 23% and 47% of pregnancies, respectively. Gestational weight gain below the recommendations was associated with higher risk of SGA (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.44-1.64]; ARD, 5% [95% CI, 4%-6%]) and preterm birth (OR, 1.70 [1.32-2.20]; ARD, 5% [3%-8%]) and lower risk of LGA (OR, 0.59 [0.55-0.64]; ARD, -2% [-10% to -6%]) and macrosomia (OR, 0.60 [0.52-0.68]; ARD, -2% [-3% to -1%]); cesarean delivery showed no significant difference (OR, 0.98 [0.96-1.02]; ARD, 0% [-2% to 1%]). Gestational weight gain above the recommendations was associated with lower risk of SGA (OR, 0.66 [0.63-0.69]; ARD, -3%; [-4% to -2%]) and preterm birth (OR, 0.77 [0.69-0.86]; ARD, -2% [-2% to -1%]) and higher risk of LGA (OR, 1.85 [1.76-1.95]; ARD, 4% [2%-5%]), macrosomia (OR, 1.95 [1.79-2.11]; ARD, 6% [4%-9%]), and cesarean delivery (OR, 1.30 [1.25-1.35]; ARD, 4% [3%-6%]). Gestational diabetes mellitus could not be evaluated because of the nature of available data. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 1 million pregnant women, 47% had gestational weight gain greater than IOM recommendations and 23% had gestational weight gain less than IOM recommendations. Gestational weight gain greater than or less than guideline recommendations, compared with weight gain within recommended levels, was associated with higher risk of adverse maternal and infant outcomes.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeWeight GainAdultBirth WeightBody Mass IndexBody WeightCesarean SectionFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant, Small for Gestational AgePregnancyPremature Birth

Identifiers

PMID28586887
PMCPMC5815056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.