ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2017
The Changing View of Input in the Treatment of Children With Grammatical Deficits.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03977701 (Manipulating Linguistic Complexity to Improve Child Language Treatment Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Manipulating Linguistic Complexity to Improve Child Language Treatment Outcomes
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Data-Informed Guideposts for Decision Making in Enhanced Conversational Recast Treatment.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Telegraphic Versus Grammatical Utterances: A Survey Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Individual Versus Small Group Treatment of Morphological Errors for Children With Developmental Language Disorder.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2019Article
- Treatment Targets for Co-Occurring Speech-Language Impairment: A Case Study.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2019Article
- Distributional Cues to Language Learning in Children With Intellectual Disabilities.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2018Review
- Learning Without Trying: The Clinical Relevance of Statistical Learning.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2018Review
- Distributional patterns in recast therapy do not systematically align with patterns in conversational data.Journal of communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this article is to present 3 approaches that emphasize the role that input plays in the treatment of grammatical deficits in children with language impairments.
methodThese approaches-input informativeness, competing sources of input, and high variability-were selected because they go beyond issues of token frequency and emphasize instead type frequency, relative frequency, and frequency at an abstract as well as a concrete level of grammar. Each of these approaches can be applied to the grammatical deficits seen in children with specific language impairment and can be readily used with well-established procedures, such as focused stimulation and recasting.
resultsEach approach is supported by a body of laboratory research with children with typical language skills, and the feasibility of each has been tested in studies with a treatment design. Furthermore, the assumptions of the 3 approaches are largely compatible, permitting application of combinations of these approaches without violating any of their principles.
conclusionThe positive findings from each of these approaches should serve as a basis for further clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.