Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28586789›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2017

The Effect of Positive SWOG Treatment Trials on Survival of Patients With Cancer in the US Population.

Joseph M Unger, Michael LeBlanc, Charles D Blanke

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00004001 phase3completednot on this map

Docetaxel and Estramustine Versus Mitoxantrone and Prednisone for Advanced, Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSWOG Cancer Research NetworkRan1999 to 2007Enrolled770ConditionsProstate CancerArmsdocetaxel, estramustine, mitoxantrone, prednisone
NCT00075764 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III Randomized Trial of Anastrozole Versus Anastrozole and Fulvestrant as First Line Therapy for Post Menopausal Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSWOG Cancer Research NetworkRan2004 to 2018Enrolled695ConditionsBreast CancerArmsanastrozole, fulvestrant
NCT00644228 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized Phase III Trial of CC-5013 (Lenalidomide, NSC-703813) and Low Dose Dexamethasone (LLD) Versus Bortezomib (PS-341, NSC-681239), Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone (BLLD) for Induction, in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Without an Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2008 to 2027Enrolled525ConditionsDS Stage I Multiple Myeloma, DS Stage II Multiple Myeloma, DS Stage III Multiple MyelomaArmsBortezomib, Dexamethasone, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Lenalidomide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How to optimize and evaluate diversity in gynecologic cancer clinical trials: statements from the GCIG Barcelona Meeting.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Population, Clinical, and Scientific Impact of National Cancer Institute's National Clinical Trials Network Treatment Studies.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Current Activities of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph M UngerSWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Michael LeBlancSWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Charles D BlankeSWOG Group Chair's Office, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Michael L. LeBlanc · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceRecently, tremendous prominence has been given to the investigation of the effect of different research processes as part of the Cancer Moonshot. More than half a century ago, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) established a network of publicly funded cancer cooperative research groups to systematically evaluate new treatments for efficacy and safety.

objectiveTo examine the extent to which positive NCI-sponsored cancer treatment trials have benefited patients with cancer in the US population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis investigation used study data from SWOG, an NCI-sponsored network cooperative research group. All treatment trials during SWOG's 60-year history (1956-2016) were identified for which the new, experimental therapy provided a statistically significant improvement in overall survival. It was assumed that the new, proven treatments from these trials established new standards for cancer care in the treatment community. Twenty-three positive SWOG treatment trials were identified from a variety of different disease settings. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: This study estimated population life-years gained from the 23 treatment trials through 2015 by mapping the effect of the new treatments onto the US cancer population using an area under the Kaplan-Meier survival curve approach that combined trial-specific hazard function and hazard ratio results, along with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and life table data. Calculations were age adjusted. The US dollar return on investment was estimated as the ratio of the total investment by the NCI in the treatment trial program divided by the estimate of life-years gained.

resultsIn total, 12 361 patients were enrolled to the 23 positive trials from 1965 to 2012. The study estimated that 3.34 million (95% confidence limit, 2.39-4.15 million) life-years were gained from these 23 trials through 2015. Estimates were greater than 2 million life-years gained under most model simulations. The US dollar return on investment was $125 per life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: SWOG treatment trials have had a substantial impact on population survival for patients with cancer over 60 years. The NCI's investment in its cancer cooperative group research program has provided exceptional value and benefit to the American public through its research programs generating positive cancer treatment trials.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00004001, NCT00075764, and NCT00644228.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSEER ProgramStandard of CareSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28586789
PMCPMC5710507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.