Trial reportJAMA oncology2017
The Effect of Positive SWOG Treatment Trials on Survival of Patients With Cancer in the US Population.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Docetaxel and Estramustine Versus Mitoxantrone and Prednisone for Advanced, Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer
Phase III Randomized Trial of Anastrozole Versus Anastrozole and Fulvestrant as First Line Therapy for Post Menopausal Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Trial of CC-5013 (Lenalidomide, NSC-703813) and Low Dose Dexamethasone (LLD) Versus Bortezomib (PS-341, NSC-681239), Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone (BLLD) for Induction, in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Without an Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Survival and Financial Benefit of Investigator-Initiated Trials Conducted by Korean Cancer Study Group.Cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- How to optimize and evaluate diversity in gynecologic cancer clinical trials: statements from the GCIG Barcelona Meeting.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024Article
- Determinants of Outcomes for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated in a Community-Based Specialized Versus Non-Specialized Hospital Setting.Clinical hematology international · 2024Article
- Population, Clinical, and Scientific Impact of National Cancer Institute's National Clinical Trials Network Treatment Studies.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Effect of Clinical Trial Participation on Costs to Payers in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2021Article
- University of Hawai'i Cancer Center Connection: University of Hawai'i Cancer Center: Collaboration Through Partnership with the National Cancer Institute.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2020Article
- Association of Patient Demographic Characteristics and Insurance Status With Survival in Cancer Randomized Clinical Trials With Positive Findings.JAMA network open · 2020Observational
- Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency.Trials · 2019Article
- Oncology clinical trials and insurance coverage: An update in a tenuous insurance landscape.Cancer · 2019Article
- Current Activities of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2019Article
- Article
- Indispensable benefit of independent investigator-driven research in a changing clinical trial landscape.ESMO open · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceRecently, tremendous prominence has been given to the investigation of the effect of different research processes as part of the Cancer Moonshot. More than half a century ago, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) established a network of publicly funded cancer cooperative research groups to systematically evaluate new treatments for efficacy and safety.
objectiveTo examine the extent to which positive NCI-sponsored cancer treatment trials have benefited patients with cancer in the US population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis investigation used study data from SWOG, an NCI-sponsored network cooperative research group. All treatment trials during SWOG's 60-year history (1956-2016) were identified for which the new, experimental therapy provided a statistically significant improvement in overall survival. It was assumed that the new, proven treatments from these trials established new standards for cancer care in the treatment community. Twenty-three positive SWOG treatment trials were identified from a variety of different disease settings. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: This study estimated population life-years gained from the 23 treatment trials through 2015 by mapping the effect of the new treatments onto the US cancer population using an area under the Kaplan-Meier survival curve approach that combined trial-specific hazard function and hazard ratio results, along with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and life table data. Calculations were age adjusted. The US dollar return on investment was estimated as the ratio of the total investment by the NCI in the treatment trial program divided by the estimate of life-years gained.
resultsIn total, 12 361 patients were enrolled to the 23 positive trials from 1965 to 2012. The study estimated that 3.34 million (95% confidence limit, 2.39-4.15 million) life-years were gained from these 23 trials through 2015. Estimates were greater than 2 million life-years gained under most model simulations. The US dollar return on investment was $125 per life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: SWOG treatment trials have had a substantial impact on population survival for patients with cancer over 60 years. The NCI's investment in its cancer cooperative group research program has provided exceptional value and benefit to the American public through its research programs generating positive cancer treatment trials.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00004001, NCT00075764, and NCT00644228.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.