Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28586533›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2017

Characterization of rapid extraction protocols for high-throughput metabolomics.

Sarah Gehrke, Julie A Reisz, Travis Nemkov, Kirk C Hansen, Angelo D'Alessandro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank: An Innovative Approach To Biobanking In Acute Care.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019
    Article
  7. Quantitative metabolomics comparison of traditional blood draws and TAP capillary blood collection.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah GehrkeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Julie A ReiszDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Travis NemkovDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Kirk C HansenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Angelo D'AlessandroDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2258-6490

Funding

Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass SpectrometerS10OD021641 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HANSEN, KIRK C · 2017 to 2017
$600k
NIH HHS S10 OD021641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleIn the last five years, high-throughput metabolomics has significantly advanced scientific research and holds the potential to promote strides in the fields of clinical metabolomics and personalized medicine. While innovations in the field of flow-injection mass spectrometry and three-minute metabolomics methods now allow investigators to process hundreds to thousands of samples per day, time-sensitive clinical applications, particularly in the emergency department, are limited by a lack of rapid extraction methods.

methodsHere we characterized the efficacy of fast liquid-liquid extractions for characterization of hydrophilic compounds through ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Internal stable-isotope-labeled standards were used to quantitatively characterize markers of energy and oxidative metabolism in human whole blood, plasma and red blood cells - three common matrices of clinical relevance.

resultsFor all the tested matrices, vortexing time (4-60 min) did not significantly affect extraction yields for the tested hydrophilic metabolites. Coefficients of variations <<20% for all tested compounds, except for the redox-sensitive metabolite cystine (accumulating over time). Internal standards and second extractions confirmed recoveries >80% for all tested metabolites, except for basic amino acids and polyamines, which showed reproducible yields ranging from 50 to 75%. Global profiling and absolute quantitation of 24 metabolites revealed similarities between the plasma and red blood cell metabolomes.

conclusionsRapid extraction (~4 min) of hydrophilic compounds is a viable and potentially automatable strategy to perform quantitative analysis of whole blood, plasma and red blood cells for research or clinical applications.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersErythrocytesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsIsotope LabelingLiquid-Liquid ExtractionMaleMetabolomeMetabolomicsTime FactorsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28586533
PMCPMC5547002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.