Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28586376›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Oncologic and surgical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis: A propensity-matched study.

Eon Chul Han, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Ji Won Park, Jin Wook Yi, Heung-Kwon Oh, Eun Kyung Choe, Heon-Kyun Ha, Byung Kwan Park, Sang Hui Moon, Seung-Yong Jeong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Eon Chul HanDepartment of Surgery, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan, Korea.
Seung-Bum RyooDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5987-3752
Ji Won ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Wook YiDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Heung-Kwon OhDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Eun Kyung ChoeSeoul National University Hospital Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea.
Heon-Kyun HaDepartment of Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Gyeonggi Province, Korea.
Byung Kwan ParkDepartment of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Hui MoonDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Yong JeongDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyu Joo ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University · KRChung-Ang University Hospital · KRDongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences · KRSeonam University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of colorectal cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis requires a thorough understanding of both diseases. This study evaluated the effect of liver cirrhosis on oncologic and surgical outcomes and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer patients. Fifty-five consecutive colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis underwent colorectal resection (LC group). Using a prospectively maintained database, these patients were matched 1:4 using propensity scoring with R programming language, package "MatchIt" and "optmatch" by sex, age, cancer location, and tumor stage with 220 patients without liver cirrhosis (non-LC group), resulting in 275 patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in the LC group than in the non-LC group (46.7% vs. 76.2% respectively, P < 0.001); however, the 5-year proportion of recurrence free (PRF) rates were similar (73.1% vs. 84.5% respectively, P = 0.094). On multivariate analysis of the LC group, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage ≥III disease, venous invasion, and a model for end-stage liver disease plus serum sodium (MELD-Na) score >10 were prognostic factors for OS. However, the OS was not different between the LC group with MELD-Na score ≤10 and the non-LC group (5-year OS rate, TNM stage ≤II, 85.7 vs 89.5%, p = 0.356; TNM stage ≥III, 41.1 vs 66.2%, p = 0.061). Colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis have poorer OS compared to those without liver cirrhosis; however, the PRF rates are similar. It might be due to the mortality from the liver, and surgical treatment should be actively considered for patients with MELD-Na score <10.

Indexed as

PrognosisAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28586376
PMCPMC5460849
OpenAlexW2623957851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.