Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28586353›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Lack of robustness of textural measures obtained from 3D brain tumor MRIs impose a need for standardization.

David Molina, Julián Pérez-Beteta, Alicia Martínez-González, Juan Martino, Carlos Velasquez, Estanislao Arana, Víctor M Pérez-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Clinicopathologic and metabolic variables fromAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Morphological MRI features as prognostic indicators in brain metastases.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Artificial intelligence-based MRI radiomics and radiogenomics in glioma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  8. Machine Learning and Radiomics in Gliomas.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Uniqueness of radiomic features in non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Evolutionary dynamics at the tumor edge reveal metabolic imaging biomarkers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David MolinaMathematical Oncology Laboratory (MÔLAB), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6104-3894
Julián Pérez-BetetaMathematical Oncology Laboratory (MÔLAB), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Alicia Martínez-GonzálezMathematical Oncology Laboratory (MÔLAB), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Juan MartinoNeurosurgery Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla and Fundación Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Carlos VelasquezNeurosurgery Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla and Fundación Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Estanislao AranaRadiology Department, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
Víctor M Pérez-GarcíaMathematical Oncology Laboratory (MÔLAB), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTextural measures have been widely explored as imaging biomarkers in cancer. However, their robustness under dynamic range and spatial resolution changes in brain 3D magnetic resonance images (MRI) has not been assessed. The aim of this work was to study potential variations of textural measures due to changes in MRI protocols. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty patients harboring glioblastoma with pretreatment 3D T1-weighted MRIs were included in the study. Four different spatial resolution combinations and three dynamic ranges were studied for each patient. Sixteen three-dimensional textural heterogeneity measures were computed for each patient and configuration including co-occurrence matrices (CM) features and run-length matrices (RLM) features. The coefficient of variation was used to assess the robustness of the measures in two series of experiments corresponding to (i) changing the dynamic range and (ii) changing the matrix size.

resultsNo textural measures were robust under dynamic range changes. Entropy was the only textural feature robust under spatial resolution changes (coefficient of variation under 10% in all cases).

conclusionTextural measures of three-dimensional brain tumor images are not robust neither under dynamic range nor under matrix size changes. Standards should be harmonized to use textural features as imaging biomarkers in radiomic-based studies. The implications of this work go beyond the specific tumor type studied here and pose the need for standardization in textural feature calculation of oncological images.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID28586353
PMCPMC5460822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.