Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28586297›Full record

ArticleGut microbes2017

Fecal microbiota variation across the lifespan of the healthy laboratory rat.

Burkhardt Flemer, Nadia Gaci, Guillaume Borrel, Ian R Sanderson, Prem P Chaudhary, William Tottey, Paul W O'Toole, Jean-François Brugère

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review to Reassess the Formula for Early Life Growth.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Impact of aging on animal models of Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The gut as a central hub for multi-organ crosstalk in aging.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Oral Microbial Ecosystem in Age-Related Xerostomia: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Burkhardt Flemera School of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork , Ireland.
Nadia Gacib EA-4678 CIDAM , Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne , Clermont-Ferrand , France.
Guillaume Borrela School of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork , Ireland.
Ian R Sandersona School of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork , Ireland.
Prem P Chaudharyb EA-4678 CIDAM , Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne , Clermont-Ferrand , France.
William Totteyb EA-4678 CIDAM , Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne , Clermont-Ferrand , France.
Paul W O'Toolea School of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork , Ireland.
Jean-François Brugèreb EA-4678 CIDAM , Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne , Clermont-Ferrand , France.ORCID 0000-0002-1559-2331

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory rats are commonly used in life science research as a model for human biology and disease, but the composition and development of their gut microbiota during life is poorly understood. We determined the fecal microbiota composition of healthy Sprague Dawley laboratory rats from 3 weeks to 2 y of age, kept under controlled environmental and dietary conditions. Additionally, we determined fecal short-chain fatty acid profiles, and we compared the rat fecal microbiota with that of mice and humans. Gut microbiota and to a lesser extent SCFAs profiles separated rats into 3 different clusters according to age: before weaning, first year of life (12- to 26-week-old animals) and second year of life (52- to 104-week-old). A core of 46 bacterial species was present in all rats but its members' relative abundance progressively decreased with age. This was accompanied by an increase of microbiota α-diversity, likely due to the acquisition of environmental microorganisms during the lifespan. Contrastingly, the functional profile of the microbiota across animal species became more similar upon aging. Lastly, the microbiota of rats and mice were most similar to each other but at the same time the microbiota profile of rats was more similar to that of humans than was the microbiota profile of mice. These data offer an explanation as to why germ-free rats are more efficient recipients and retainers of human microbiota than mice. Furthermore, experimental design should take into account dynamic changes in the microbiota of model animals considering that their changing gut microbiota interacts with their physiology.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAge FactorsAnimalsFecesHumansMiceRats, Sprague-Dawleygut microbiotahuman biologic modellifespan evolutionRatRattus norvegicus

Identifiers

PMID28586297
PMCPMC5628645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.