Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2017
Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,333 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III, Open-Label Study of Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Treatment-Naive Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Phase II, Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter Study to Assess the Activity and Safety of ALectinib as NEO-adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-positive (ALK+) Locally Advanced Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): ALNEO Trial
TEMPUS GEMINI NSCLC STUDY: A Longitudinal Multi-Omic Biomarker Profiling Study of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase I/II Open-label Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Alectinib With Sequential Dose Escalation in Patients Diagnosed With ALK-rearranged Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Potential Effect of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functioning of Patients With ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Lorlatinib
Who cites it
1,333 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Health-related quality of life among anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first- and next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Optimizing post-acute care inpatient rehabilitation for patients with brain metastasis: A systematic review of functional outcomes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Kinetics and management of adverse events associated with lorlatinib after 5 years of follow-up in the CROWN study.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Etirinotecan Pegol (NKTR-102) in Patients With Active Brain Metastases From Lung or Breast Cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Trial
- Alectinib in combination with bevacizumab as first-line treatment in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (ALEK-B): a single-arm, phase 2 trial.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Cost of managing brain metastases in patients with ALK+ advanced NSCLC with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the UK.Lung cancer management · 2026Article
- Cost of managing brain metastases in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line ALK TKIs in China.Lung cancer management · 2026Article
- Synthetic strategies and therapeutic insights into FDA-approved indole-containing drugs.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Clinical characteristics of ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with sequential ALK-TKI therapies in a single-centre.Lung cancer management · 2026Article
- A Systematic Intracranial Exposure-Response Evaluation of Brain-Penetrant Inhibitors: Informing Dose Selection for Brain Metastases.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Oncogenic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: from molecular mechanisms to clinical practice.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Sociodemographic inequalities in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) novel treatments: a national population-based cohort study.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2026Article
- Real-world evolution of first-line ALK-positive NSCLC management in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Real-World First-Line Treatment Characteristics and Physician Drivers in Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and without Actionable Genomic Alterations.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- Living WithJTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Observational
- Targeted ALK inhibition achieving tumour control in metastatic melanoma: a case report.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- A new chapter in targeting kinase enzymes in cancer.Nature · 2026Article
1,273 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease.
methodsIn a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in the alectinib group and 102 of 151 patients (68%) in the crizotinib group. The rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher with alectinib than with crizotinib (12-month event-free survival rate, 68.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.0 to 75.9] with alectinib vs. 48.7% [95% CI, 40.4 to 56.9] with crizotinib; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65]; P<0.001); the median progression-free survival with alectinib was not reached. The results for independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival were consistent with those for the primary end point. A total of 18 patients (12%) in the alectinib group had an event of CNS progression, as compared with 68 patients (45%) in the crizotinib group (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.28; P<0.001). A response occurred in 126 patients in the alectinib group (response rate, 82.9%; 95% CI, 76.0 to 88.5) and in 114 patients in the crizotinib group (response rate, 75.5%; 95% CI, 67.8 to 82.1) (P=0.09). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib (41% vs. 50% with crizotinib).
conclusionsAs compared with crizotinib, alectinib showed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in primary treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ALEX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02075840 .).
Indexed as
Identifiers
28586279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.