ArticleNature communications2017
Conserved linear dynamics of single-molecule Brownian motion.
Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined TIRF and 3D Super-Resolution Microscopy for Nanoscopic Characterization of Adhesion Molecules on Microvilli.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Deep Learning and Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy Reveal Nanoscopic Dynamics of DNA Entanglement Loci.ACS nano · 2025Article
- A spatial measure-valued model for radiation-induced DNA damage kinetics and repair under protracted irradiation condition.Journal of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- Single-molecule imaging and microfluidic platform reveal molecular mechanisms of leukemic cell rolling.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Role of Brownian Particle Velocity in Bioelectronic Emissions of DNA.Bioelectricity · 2020Article
- Entangled polymer dynamics beyond reptation.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Microfluidics-based super-resolution microscopy enables nanoscopic characterization of blood stem cell rolling.Science advances · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macromolecular diffusion in homogeneous fluid at length scales greater than the size of the molecule is regarded as a random process. The mean-squared displacement (MSD) of molecules in this regime increases linearly with time. Here we show that non-random motion of DNA molecules in this regime that is undetectable by the MSD analysis can be quantified by characterizing the molecular motion relative to a latticed frame of reference. Our lattice occupancy analysis reveals unexpected sub-modes of motion of DNA that deviate from expected random motion in the linear, diffusive regime. We demonstrate that a subtle interplay between these sub-modes causes the overall diffusive motion of DNA to appear to conform to the linear regime. Our results show that apparently random motion of macromolecules could be governed by non-random dynamics that are detectable only by their relative motion. Our analytical approach should advance broad understanding of diffusion processes of fundamental relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.