Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28585148›Full record

Observational studyJournal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban2017

Combined use of single-balloon enteroscope and colonoscope for self-expandable metal stent placement in patients with malignant small intestinal obstruction: a single-center comparative clinical observation.

Ya-Fei Zhang, Shou-Bin Ning, Bai-Rong Li, Jing Zhang, Jing Li, Jie Tang, Ming Zhu, Xiao-Wei Jin, Qiu Zhao, Gao-Ping Mao

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ya-Fei ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Air Force, PLA, Beijing, 100142, China.
Shou-Bin NingDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Air Force, PLA, Beijing, 100142, China. ning-shoubin@163.com.
Bai-Rong LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Air Force, PLA, Beijing, 100142, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Air Force, PLA, Beijing, 100142, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Air Force, PLA, Beijing, 100142, China.
Jie TangDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Air Force, PLA, Beijing, 100142, China.
Ming ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Air Force, PLA, Beijing, 100142, China.
Xiao-Wei JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Air Force, PLA, Beijing, 100142, China.
Qiu ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Gao-Ping MaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Air Force, PLA, Beijing, 100142, China.
Air Force General Hospital PLA · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small intestinal obstruction is a common complication of primary gastrointestinal cancer or metastatic cancers. Patients with this condition are often poor candidates for surgical bypasses, and placement of self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) can be technically challenging. In this study, we examined the feasibility of combined application of single-balloon enteroscope (SBE) and colonoscope for SEMS placement in patients with malignant small intestinal obstruction. Thirty-four patients were enrolled in this study, among which 22 patients received SEMS placement by using SBE and colonoscope, while the other 12 patients received conservative medical treatment. The patients were followed up for one year. Stent placement was technically feasible in 95.5% (21/22). Clinical improvement was achieved in 86.4% (19/22). For the 19 clinical success cases, the average time of benefits from a gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) increase ≥1 was 111.9±89.5 days. For the 12 patients receiving conservative medical treatment, no significant improvement in GOOSS score was observed. Moreover, a significant increase of Short-Form-36 health survey score was observed in the 19 patients at time of 30 days after stent placement. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, a significant survival improvement was observed in patients with successful SEMS placement, compared with patients receiving conservative medical treatment. Taken together, combined use of SBE and colonoscope makes endoscopic stent placement feasible in patients with malignant small intestinal obstruction, and patients can benefit from it in terms of prolonged survival and improved quality of life.

Indexed as

Self Expandable Metallic StentsAgedColonoscopyFemaleGastric Outlet ObstructionGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansIntestinal ObstructionIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareQuality of LifeSingle-Balloon EnteroscopySurvival Analysiscolonoscopesingle-balloon enteroscopesmall intestinal obstructionstent placement

Identifiers

PMID28585148
OpenAlexW2743298519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.