Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28585100›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2017

How Do We Get Partners to Test for HIV?: Predictors of Uptake of Partner HIV Testing Following Individual Outpatient Provider Initiated HIV Testing in Rural Uganda.

Susan M Kiene, Olumide Gbenro, Katelyn M Sileo, Haruna Lule, Rhoda K Wanyenze

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perceptions of women enrolled in a cardiovascular disease screening and prevention in HIV study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan M KieneDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Diego State University Graduate School of Public Health, 5500 Campanile Drive (MC-4162), San Diego, CA, 92182, USA. skiene@mail.sdsu.edu.
Olumide GbenroDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Diego State University Graduate School of Public Health, 5500 Campanile Drive (MC-4162), San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Katelyn M SileoDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Diego State University Graduate School of Public Health, 5500 Campanile Drive (MC-4162), San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Haruna LuleGombe General Hospital, Gombe, Uganda.
Rhoda K WanyenzeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
San Diego State University · USMakerere University · UG

Funding

Client-Centered Counseling During Routine/Opt-Out HIV-Testing in UgandaK01MH083536 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI KIENE, SUSAN MARIA · 2008 to 2012
$781k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH083536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a sample of outpatients (152 females, 152 males) receiving individual provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) we aimed to identify factors associated with subsequent uptake of partner HIV testing. Purposively sampled outpatients receiving PITC at a Ugandan hospital completed a questionnaire immediately prior to testing for HIV, and then at 3 and 6 months post-test. By 6-month follow-up 96% of participants reported disclosing their HIV test results to their partner and 96.4% reported asking their partner to test. 38.8% of women and 78.9% of men reported that their partner tested and they knew their results. Recent (men AOR 5.84, 95.0% CI 1.90-17.99; women AOR 6.19, 95.0% CI 2.74-13.59) or any previous testing by the partner (women AOR 4.01, 95% CI 1.06-15.10) predicted uptake of partner testing by the 6-month follow-up. Among women, perceiving greater social support from their partner, which perhaps reflects better relationship quality, was predictive of their male partner testing for HIV (AOR 2.37, 95% CI 1.22-4.58). Notably intimate partner violence showed no negative association with partner testing. Our findings demonstrate that women are at a disadvantage compared to men in their ability to influence their partner to test for HIV, and that improving social support in intimate relationships should be a focus of HIV partner testing interventions. However, more research on interventions to improve partner testing is needed, particularly in identifying effective ways to support women in engaging their partners to test.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSexual PartnersSocial SupportAdultAgedCounselingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSpouse AbuseSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaHIV preventionPartner HIV testingSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID28585100
PMCPMC5543713
OpenAlexW2624234082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.