Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28585055›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2018

Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention.

Megan T deBettencourt, Kenneth A Norman, Nicholas B Turk-Browne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Attending to Remember: Recent Advances in Methods and Theory.Current directions in psychological science · 2025
    Article
  7. Rewards transiently and automatically enhance sustained attention.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Semantic associations restore neural encoding mechanisms.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Intersubject similarity in neural representations underlies shared episodic memory content.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan T deBettencourtPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. debetten@uchicago.edu.
Kenneth A NormanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Nicholas B Turk-BrownePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Neural and Behavioral Interactions Between Attention, Perception, and LearningR01EY021755 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TURK-BROWNE, NICHOLAS BENJAMIN · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
National Science Foundation DGE1148900NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NEI NIH HHS EY021755NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When performing any task for an extended period of time, attention fluctuates between good and bad states. These fluctuations affect performance in the moment, but may also have lasting consequences for what gets encoded into memory. Experiment 1 establishes this relationship between attentional states and memory, by showing that subsequent memory for an item was predicted by a response time index of sustained attention (average response time during the three trials prior to stimulus onset). Experiment 2 strengthens the causal interpretation of this predictive relationship by treating the sustained attention index as an independent variable to trigger the appearance of an encoding trial. Subsequent memory was better when items were triggered from good versus bad attentional states. Together, these findings suggest that sustained attention can have downstream consequences for what we remember, and they highlight the inferential utility of adaptive experimental designs. By continuously monitoring attention, we can influence what will later be remembered.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, EpisodicFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMental RecallReaction TimeYoung AdultDistractionEpisodic memoryGoal-directed attentionReal time

Identifiers

PMID28585055
PMCPMC5716934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.