ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2017
Exact analytical results for integrate-and-fire neurons driven by excitatory shot noise.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extraction of parameters of a stochastic integrate-and-fire model with adaptation from voltage recordings.Biological cybernetics · 2024Article
- Model-agnostic neural mean field with a data-driven transfer function.Neuromorphic computing and engineering · 2024Article
- Model-Agnostic Neural Mean Field With The Refractory SoftPlus Transfer Function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Recurrence-mediated suprathreshold stochastic resonance.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2021Article
- Information filtering by coincidence detection of synchronous population output: analytical approaches to the coherence function of a two-stage neural system.Biological cybernetics · 2020Article
- Self-Consistent Scheme for Spike-Train Power Spectra in Heterogeneous Sparse Networks.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A neuron receives input from other neurons via electrical pulses, so-called spikes. The pulse-like nature of the input is frequently neglected in analytical studies; instead, the input is usually approximated to be Gaussian. Recent experimental studies have shown, however, that an assumption underlying this approximation is often not met: Individual presynaptic spikes can have a significant effect on a neuron's dynamics. It is thus desirable to explicitly account for the pulse-like nature of neural input, i.e. consider neurons driven by a shot noise - a long-standing problem that is mathematically challenging. In this work, we exploit the fact that excitatory shot noise with exponentially distributed weights can be obtained as a limit case of dichotomous noise, a Markovian two-state process. This allows us to obtain novel exact expressions for the stationary voltage density and the moments of the interspike-interval density of general integrate-and-fire neurons driven by such an input. For the special case of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons, we also give expressions for the power spectrum and the linear response to a signal. We verify and illustrate our expressions by comparison to simulations of leaky-, quadratic- and exponential integrate-and-fire neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28585050What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.