ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2018
Characterizing the interactions of two lipid modifications with lipid rafts: farnesyl anchors vs. palmitoyl anchors.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enzymatic Prenylation of Proteins and Peptides: From Cysteine S-Prenylation to Tryptophan-Selective Biocatalysis.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Every Detail Matters. That Is, How the Interaction between Gα Proteins and Membrane Affects Their Function.Membranes · 2021Review
- Multiscale Simulations of Biological Membranes: The Challenge To Understand Biological Phenomena in a Living Substance.Chemical reviews · 2019Article
- Effect of drug amlodipine on the charged lipid bilayer cell membranes DMPS and DMPS + DMPC: a molecular dynamics simulation study.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Farnesyl (Far) and palmitoyl (Pal) anchors play important roles in the traffic of many lipidated proteins. Herein, we show the distinctive interactions and influences of the two lipid modifications on lipid rafts (LRs) and non-raft-like membranes using molecular dynamics simulations. Palmitoyl anchors behave in a more ordered fashion, pack tighter with the lipids of LRs and diffuse at a slower rate than farnesyl anchors in LRs. When interacting with non-raft-like membranes these two types of anchors become less ordered, pack more loosely with lipids, and diffuse at a higher rate. By calculating both the number of contacts per chain and the number of contact atoms per carbon of the two anchors with the lipid components, we found that the palmitoyl chains preferred to associate with the saturated chains of lipids and cholesterol molecules in LRs, while farnesyl chains favored association with saturated chains and unsaturated chains. For non-raft-like membranes, these two lipid anchors had roughly the same preference for the three types of contact lipid chains. Additionally, palmitoyl anchors caused cholesterol to orient more perpendicular to the membrane surface, surrounding lipids to become more ordered, and lipid lateral fluidity to reduce significantly, compared to farnesyl anchors in LRs. By contrast, the POPE and DSPC became much less ordered, cholesterol became more tilted, and lipids became more fluid, when the two types lipid anchors were inserted in non-raft-like membranes. These findings are useful for understanding the traffic mechanisms of lipidated proteins with farnesyl and palmitoyl modifications in cell membranes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28585042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.