Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28585019›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2017

Women in the midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle have difficulty suppressing the processing of negative emotional stimuli: An event-related potential study.

Bethany R Lusk, Andrea R Carr, Valerie A Ranson, Kim L Felmingham

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Event-related potential studies of emotion regulation: A review of recent progress and future directions.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bethany R LuskSchool of Medicine (Division of Psychology), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia. brlusk@utas.edu.au.
Andrea R CarrDivision of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Students and Education), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia.
Valerie A RansonSchool of Medicine (Division of Psychology), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia.
Kim L FelminghamSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion regulation deficits have been implicated in anxiety and depressive disorders, and these internalising disorders are more prevalent in women than men. Few electrophysiological studies have investigated sex differences in emotional reactivity and emotion regulation controlling for menstrual phase. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 28 early follicular women, 29 midluteal women, and 27 men who completed an emotion regulation task. A novel finding of increased N2 amplitude during suppression was found for midluteal women compared with men. These findings suggest midluteal women may be significantly less able to suppress cortical processing of negative stimuli compared to men. This ERP finding was complemented by behavioral ratings data which revealed that while both early follicular and midluteal women reported more distress than men, midluteal women also reported greater effort when suppressing their responses than men. P1 and N1 components were increased in midluteal women compared to men regardless of instructional set, suggesting greater early attentional processing. No sex or menstrual phase differences were apparent in P3 or LPP. This study underscores the importance of considering menstrual phase when examining sex differences in the cortical processing of emotion regulation and demonstrates that midluteal women may have deficits in down-regulating their neural and behavioural responses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionBrainCross-Sectional StudiesElectroencephalographyEmotional IntelligenceEmotionsEstradiolEvoked PotentialsExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMenstrual CycleProgesteroneEstradiolProgesteroneAttention biasEmotion regulationEvent-related potentialMenstrual cycleMidluteal phaseSex differences

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.