Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28584929›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2017

Steep effort discounting of a preferred reward over a freely-available option in prolonged methamphetamine withdrawal in male rats.

Andrew B Thompson, Julian Gerson, Alexandra Stolyarova, Amador Bugarin, Evan E Hart, J David Jentsch, Alicia Izquierdo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Chemogenetic Modulation and Single-Photon Calcium Imaging in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Reveal a Mechanism for Effort-Based Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew B ThompsonDepartment of Psychology, The Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. abthompson@ucla.edu.
Julian GersonDepartment of Psychology, The Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alexandra StolyarovaDepartment of Psychology, The Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Amador BugarinDepartment of Psychology, The Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Evan E HartDepartment of Psychology, The Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J David JentschDepartment of Psychology, The Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alicia IzquierdoDepartment of Psychology, The Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. aizquie@psych.ucla.edu.

Funding

UCLA Training Program in Translational Neuroscience of Drug Abuse (TNDA)T32DA024635 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LARA A. RAY, Kate M Wassum · 2008 to 2026
$6.2M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA024635NIH HHS T32 DA024635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDrug addiction can be described as aberrant allocation of effort toward acquiring drug, despite associated costs. It is unclear if this behavioral pattern results from an overvaluation of reward or to an altered sensitivity to costs.

objectivePresent experiments assessed reward sensitivity and effortful choice in rats following 1 week of withdrawal from methamphetamine (mAMPH).

methodsRats were treated with either saline or an escalating dose mAMPH regimen, then tested after a week without the drug. In experiment 1, rats were given a free choice between water and various concentrations of sucrose solution to assess general reward sensitivity. In experiment 2, rats were presented with a choice between lever-pressing for sucrose pellets on a progressive ratio schedule or consuming freely-available chow.

resultsIn experiment 1, we found no differences in sucrose preference between mAMPH- and saline-pretreated rats. In experiment 2, when selecting between two options, mAMPH-pretreated rats engaged in less lever-pressing for sucrose pellets (p < 0.01) and switched from this preferred reward to the chow sooner than saline-pretreated rats (p < 0.05). This effect was not consistent with general reward devaluation or loss of motivation.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that mAMPH exposure and withdrawal lead to steeper discounting of reward value by effort, an effect that is consistent with the effect of mAMPH on discounting by delay, and which may reflect an underlying shared mechanism.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsChoice BehaviorDelay DiscountingMaleMethamphetamineMotivationRatsRats, Long-EvansSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTime FactorsCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamineCost-benefit decision-makingEffort discountingPsychostimulantReward sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID28584929
PMCPMC6441328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.