Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28584925›Full record

Observational studyIntensive care medicine2017

Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis.

Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi, Natalia Viu Degaspare, Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz, Ana Paula Matos Porto, Silvia Figueiredo Costa, Otavio T Ranzani

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [RCT of Reduction in Catheter-Related Complications by Using Intracavitary Electrocardiogram-Assisted Guidance in Neonatal PICC Placement].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Development and Implementation of a Bedside Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Service in a PICU.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Dislodgement Rates of Tunneled Femoral Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Pediatric Oncology Patients.Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo Silveira YamaguchiAmericas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute, Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo, 04013-060, Brazil. ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br.
Danilo Teixeira NoritomiAmericas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute, Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo, 04013-060, Brazil.
Natalia Viu DegaspareAmericas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute, Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo, 04013-060, Brazil.
Gabriela Ortega Cisternas MuñozAmericas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute, Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo, 04013-060, Brazil.
Ana Paula Matos PortoAmericas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute, Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo, 04013-060, Brazil.
Silvia Figueiredo CostaLaboratory of Bacteriology (LIM 54), Department of Infectious Diseases, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Otavio T RanzaniAmericas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute, Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo, 04013-060, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCentral line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in critically ill children.

methodsWe have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included patients aged 0-14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.

resultsA total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI incidence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70-3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05-4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02-4.64; p = 0.044) after adding place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.

conclusionsPICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention.

Indexed as

AdolescentBacteremiaCatheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricMalePropensity ScoreCentral venous lineInfectionPaediatric intensive care unitPeripherally inserted central catheter

Identifiers

PMID28584925
OpenAlexW2622149382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.