Trial reportJournal of neurology2017
Effects of different doses of triazolam in the middle-of-the-night insomnia: a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy, Safety, and Drug-Drug Interactions for Insomnia Therapy in COVID-19 Patients.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Review
- Simplified drug efficacy screening system for sleep-disorder drugs using non-human primates.Heliyon · 2020Article
- Insomnia in Elderly Patients: Recommendations for Pharmacological Management.Drugs & aging · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been reported that insomnia characterized by difficulty returning to sleep following a nocturnal awakening, otherwise defined as the middle-of-the-night (MOTN) insomnia, is a common form of insomnia in adults with growing prevalence by increasing age. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different dosages of triazolam in insomnia patients when taken after a MOTN awakening with difficulty returning to sleep. In this double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, 24 patients (mean age 41.00 ± 10.40, 10 female and 14 male) affected by MOTN insomnia were enrolled and randomized into three groups according to different dosages of triazolam: group A (0.0625 mg), group B (0.125 mg), and group C (0.250 mg). A significant increment of total sleep time, sleep efficiency and a reduction of wake after sleep onset, number of awakening and non-REM sleep stage 1 was observed in T1 (triazolam) in comparison to T0 (placebo) by means of polysomnographic recording, irrespective of dosage. After 2 weeks of the treatment, insomnia severity significantly improved in all three groups in comparison to baseline without diurnal residual effects. This study demonstrates that low dose of triazolam objectively and subjectively improves the sleep of patients having MOTN insomnia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.