ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Direct Resin-based Composites.
Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning based approach for surface roughness prediction in precision dental prototyping.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of different polishing techniques on surface roughness, gloss, and microhardness of zirconium oxide reinforced flowable bulk-fill resin composite: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Investigating the Effect of Staining Beverages on the Structural and Mechanical Integrity of Dental Composites Using Raman, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, and Microhardness Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Stability of Optical and Mechanical Properties in Multi-Shade, Group-Shade, and Single-Shade Resin Composites.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Enhancing Esthetics in Direct Dental Resin Composite: Investigating Surface Roughness and Color Stability.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Finishing and polishing systems influence the roughness and color stability of acrylic and bis-acryl composite resins.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Article
- The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microbial Adhesion of Bulk Fill Composites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in dentistry · 2023Article
- Biomaterials and Clinical Applications of Customized Healing Abutment-A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Color stability and surface roughness of ormocer- versus methacrylate-based single shade composite in anterior restoration.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Surface evaluations of a nanocomposite after different finishing and polishing systems for anterior and posterior restorations.Microscopy research and technique · 2021Article
- The Bond Strength and Antibacterial Activity of the Universal Dentin Bonding System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Bacterial Adhesion ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The effects of irradiance and exposure time on the surface roughness of bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials.Saudi medical journal · 2018Article
- Evaluation of Effect of Dietary Solvents on Bond Strength of Compomer, Ormocer, Nanocomposite and Activa Bioactive Restorative Materials.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectiveTo evaluate surface roughness of different resin-based composites. MATERIALS AND
methodsThree resin composites, one nanohybrid, one nanoceramic, and one bulk-fill resin-based composite, were used in this study. Cylindrical Teflon mold and 8 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness disc specimens were prepared. For each composite material, 15 discs were fabricated, with a total of sixty discs were obtained (
resultsTetric Evo Ceram and Tetric Evo Ceram Bulk-Fill specimens polished with Eve revealed slightly the same surface appearance as the Mylar strip. Eve discs scratched and exposed fillers of Ceram-x. Eve discs for Z250 surfaces exposed and scratched the filler particles but less than occurred with Ceram-x.
conclusionBulk-Fill and nanohybrid resin composites exhibit smoothest surfaces compared with nanoceramic and microhybrid resin composites after polishing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.