Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28584723›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Selection of housekeeping genes as internal controls for quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the veined rapa whelk (

Hao Song, Xin Dang, Yuan-Qiu He, Tao Zhang, Hai-Yan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Properties of Putative APSES Transcription Factor AfpA inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrated mRNA and miRNA transcriptomic analysis reveals the response ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characterization of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hao SongCAS Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Xin DangCollege of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China.
Yuan-Qiu HeCollege of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China.
Tao ZhangCAS Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Hai-Yan WangCAS Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Institute of Oceanology · CNOcean University of China · CNQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe veined rapa whelk

methodsIn this study, we selected the following 13 candidate genes for suitability as internal controls: elongation factor-1

resultsOf the 13 candidate genes tested, we found that DISCUSSION: Our results are instrumental for the selection of appropriately validated housekeeping genes for use as internal controls for gene expression studies in adult tissues or larval development of

Indexed as

DevelopmentInternal controlRapana venosaReal-time PCRTissue

Identifiers

PMID28584723
PMCPMC5455708
OpenAlexW2620312173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.