ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
"Scarless" Inguinal Herniorrhaphy.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLaparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy is widely accepted. Robotic-assisted surgery provides improved 3-dimensional visualization and enhanced dexterity. The purpose of this case series was to demonstrate the feasibility of a modified, robotic, single-site, unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. TECHNIQUE: Six patients 18 years of age or older with a body mass index <35 provided informed consent and underwent hernia repair with a modified herniorrhaphy technique from January to July 2014. Eight patients were screened and six case experiences are described in this series. The da Vinci Si robot, gel port, and instruments (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, California, USA) were used. With the patient in Trendelenburg position, a 25-mm incision was made within the umbilicus. The fascia was incised, and the peritoneal cavity was entered. A robotic cholecystectomy gel port was placed. Robotic instruments were inserted, and the robot was docked. A preperitoneal flap was raised on the affected side with the robotic instruments used interchangeably. The hernia sac was identified and reduced, and the mesh was tacked in place. The preperitoneal flap was tacked back in place. The robot was undocked, the abdomen was desufflated, and the fascia was closed. DISCUSSION: Single-site unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy was performed for 6 patients. All patients were discharged the same day, had good aesthetic results, and experienced no hernia recurrence. Robotic single-site gel port inguinal herniorrhaphy is feasible and appears as safe and time efficient as laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in this small group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.