Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28584491›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences

Evaluation of

R Sunil Kumar, Ramesh Balenahalli Narasingappa, Chandrashekar G Joshi, Talakatta K Girish, Ummiti Js Prasada Rao, Ananda Danagoudar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R Sunil KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Hassan, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ramesh Balenahalli NarasingappaDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Hassan, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Chandrashekar G JoshiDepartment of Studies and Research in Biochemistry, P.G Centre, Mangalore University, Chikka Aluvara, Kodagu, Karnataka, India.
Talakatta K GirishDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Ummiti Js Prasada RaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Ananda DanagoudarDepartment of Studies and Research in Biochemistry, P.G Centre, Mangalore University, Chikka Aluvara, Kodagu, Karnataka, India.
University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore · INCentral Food Technological Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study aims to evaluate antioxidants and protective role of MATERIALS AND

methodsThe total and profiles of flavonoids were identified and quantified through reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

resultsThe total flavonoid content of CtEA was 106.8 ± 2.8 mg/g d.w.QE, CtME was 72.4 ± 1.12 mg/g d.w.QE, and CtWE was 30.4 ± 0.8 mg/g d.w.QE. The concentration of flavonoids present in CtEA in decreasing order: quercetin >kaempferol >epicatechin; in CtME: quercetin >rutin >kaempferol; whereas, in CtWE: quercetin >rutin >kaempferol. The CtEA inhibited free radical-induced red blood cell hemolysis and cell membrane morphology better than CtME as confirmed by a scanning electron micrograph. CtEA also showed better protection than CtME and CtWE against free radical-induced DNA damage as confirmed by electrophoresis.

conclusion

Indexed as

AntioxidantsCassia tora extractDNA protectionfree radicalsmembrane protectionscanning electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID28584491
PMCPMC5450468
OpenAlexW2616808343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.