Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28584436›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2017

Titration of Ideal Positive End-expiratory Pressure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison between Lower Inflection Point and Esophageal Pressure Method Using Volumetric Capnography.

Nandakishore Baikunje, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, Sahajal Dhooria, Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad, Ritesh Agarwal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nandakishore BaikunjeDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Inderpaul Singh SehgalDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sahajal DhooriaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Kuruswamy Thurai PrasadDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ritesh AgarwalDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tenets of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) include the utilization of low tidal volume and optimal application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Optimal PEEP in ARDS is characterized by reduction in alveolar dead space along with improvement in the lung compliance and resultant betterment in oxygenation. There are various methods of setting PEEP in ARDS. Herein, we report a patient of ARDS, wherein we employed measurement of dead space using volumetric capnography to compare two different PEEP strategies, namely, the lower inflection point and transpulmonary pressure monitoring.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeesophageal balloonlower inflection pointoptimal positive end-expiratory pressuretranspulmonary pressure

Identifiers

PMID28584436
PMCPMC5455026
OpenAlexW2616617985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.