Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28584099›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Genome-wide use of high- and low-affinity Tbrain transcription factor binding sites during echinoderm development.

Gregory A Cary, Alys M Cheatle Jarvela, Rene D Francolini, Veronica F Hinman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Non-continuum Nature of Eukaryotic Transcriptional Regulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Integration of 1:1 orthology maps and updated datasets into Echinobase.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Gene regulatory networks and network models in development and evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregory A CaryDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Alys M Cheatle JarvelaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Rene D FrancoliniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Veronica F HinmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 veronica@cmu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3573-5229
Carnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea stars and sea urchins are model systems for interrogating the types of deep evolutionary changes that have restructured developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Although

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesEchinodermataEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksMiceT-Box Domain ProteinsT-Box Domain ProteinsT-box protein, starfishbinding site affinityChIP-seqechinodermTbrain

Identifiers

PMID28584099
PMCPMC5468674
OpenAlexW2622846400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.