Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28584090›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Paleogenomics of echinoids reveals an ancient origin for the double-negative specification of micromeres in sea urchins.

Jeffrey R Thompson, Eric M Erkenbrack, Veronica F Hinman, Brenna S McCauley, Elizabeth Petsios, David J Bottjer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Developmental atlas of the indirect-developing sea urchinFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Gene regulatory networks and network models in development and evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey R ThompsonDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089; thompsjr@usc.edu.
Eric M ErkenbrackDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0001-9375-3279
Veronica F HinmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.ORCID 0000-0003-3573-5229
Brenna S McCauleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Elizabeth PetsiosDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
David J BottjerDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
University of Southern California · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCarnegie Mellon University · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing a timeline for the evolution of novelties is a common, unifying goal at the intersection of evolutionary and developmental biology. Analyses of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) provide the ability to understand the underlying genetic and developmental mechanisms responsible for the origin of morphological structures both in the development of an individual and across entire evolutionary lineages. Accurately dating GRN novelties, thereby establishing a timeline for GRN evolution, is necessary to answer questions about the rate at which GRNs and their subcircuits evolve, and to tie their evolution to paleoenvironmental and paleoecological changes. Paleogenomics unites the fossil record and all aspects of deep time, with modern genomics and developmental biology to understand the evolution of genomes in evolutionary time. Recent work on the regulatory genomic basis of development in cidaroid echinoids, sand dollars, heart urchins, and other nonmodel echinoderms provides an ideal dataset with which to explore GRN evolution in a comparative framework. Using divergence time estimation and ancestral state reconstructions, we have determined the age of the double-negative gate (DNG), the subcircuit which specifies micromeres and skeletogenic cells in

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsGenomicsPhylogenyStrongylocentrotus purpuratuscidaroideuechinoidevo-devoevolutiongene regulatory networks

Identifiers

PMID28584090
PMCPMC5468677
OpenAlexW2623765421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.