ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2017
Impact of the Publication of Appropriate Use Criteria on Utilization Rates of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Studies in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of a Change in the Eligibility Criteria for Multidisciplinary Kidney Care.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
- Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on Cardiovascular Testing in the United States Versus the Rest of the World.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Appropriate utilization of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of stable coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Clinical Effectiveness of Cardiac Noninvasive Diagnostic Testing in Outpatients Evaluated for Stable Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Observational
- Utilization and Costs of Noninvasive Cardiac Tests After Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Alberta COAPT Study.CJC open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConcern regarding overutilization of cardiac imaging has led to the development of appropriate use criteria (AUC). Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is one of the most commonly used cardiac imaging modalities worldwide. Despite multiple iterations of AUC, there is currently no evidence regarding their real-world impact on population-based utilization rates of MPI. Our goal was to assess the impact of the AUC on rates of MPI in Ontario, Canada. We hypothesized that publication of the AUC would be associated with a significant reduction in MPI rates. METHODS AND
resultsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of the adult population of Ontario from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2015. Age- and sex-standardized rates were compared from 4 different periods intersected by 3 published iterations of the AUC. Overall, 3 072 611 MPI scans were performed in Ontario during our study period. The mean monthly rate increased from 14.1/10 000 in the period from January 2000 to October 2005 to 18.2/10 000 between November 2005 and June 2009. After this point in time, there was a reduction in rates, falling to a mean monthly rate of 17.1/10 000 between March 2014 and December 2015. Time series analysis revealed that publication of the 2009 AUC was associated with a significant reduction in MPI rates (
conclusionsOur results reflect a potential real-world impact of the 2009 MPI AUC by demonstrating evidence of a significant effect on population-based rates of MPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.