Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28583944›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Variation in referral and access to new psychological therapy services by age: an empirical quantitative study.

Sophie Pettit, Adam Qureshi, William Lee, Alex Stirzaker, Alex Gibson, William Henley, Richard Byng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to identify and manage depression delivered by 'nontraditional' providers to community-dwelling older adults: A realist review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Making sense of mental health in later life: social network dynamics and service access.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Overcoming the Dual Stigma of Mental Illness and Aging: Preparing New Nurses to Care for the Mental Health Needs of Older Adults.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie PettitCollege of Nursing, Midwifery and Healthcare, University of West London, London.
Adam QureshiDepartment of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk.
William LeeClinical Trials and Population Studies, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth.
Alex StirzakerAvon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Chippenham.
Alex GibsonSchool of Law, Criminology and Government, Plymouth University, Plymouth.
William HenleyUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter.
Richard ByngClinical Trials and Population Studies, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth.
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people with common mental health problems (CMHPs) are known to have reduced rates of referral to psychological therapy.

aimTo assess referral rates to the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services, contact with a therapist, and clinical outcome by age. DESIGN AND

settingEmpirical research study using patient episodes of care from South West of England IAPT services.

methodBy analysing 82 513 episodes of care (2010-2011), referral rates and clinical improvement were compared with both total population and estimated prevalence in each age group using IAPT data. Probable recovery of those completing treatment was calculated for each group.

resultsEstimated prevalence of CMHPs peaks in 45-49-year-olds (20.59% of population). The proportions of patients identified with CMHPs being referred peaks at 20-24 years (22.95%) and reduces with increase in age thereafter to 6.00% for 70-74-year-olds. Once referred, the proportion of those attending first treatment increases with age between 20 years (57.34%) and 64 years (76.97%). In addition, the percentage of those having a clinical improvement gradually increases from the age of 18 years (12.94%) to 69 years (20.74%).

conclusionYounger adults are more readily referred to IAPT services. However, as a proportion of those referred, probabilities of attending once, attending more than once, and clinical improvement increase with age. It is uncertain whether optimum levels of referral have been reached for young adults. It is important to establish whether changes to service configuration, treatment options, and GP behaviour can increase referrals for middle-aged and older adults.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPsychotherapyAdolescentAdultAge DistributionAge FactorsEmpirical ResearchEnglandFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMental Disordersage factorsIAPTmental healthreferral and consultationtherapy, psychological

Identifiers

PMID28583944
PMCPMC5565877
OpenAlexW2621832144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.