Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28583943›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Impact of travel time and rurality on presentation and outcomes of symptomatic colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional cohort study in primary care.

Peninah Murage, Peter Murchie, Max Bachmann, Michael Crawford, Andy Jones

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03836794 (Does Geography and Place of Residence Affect Cancer Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03836794 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Does Geography and Place of Residence Affect Cancer Care: An Interview Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AberdeenRan2019 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsCancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Impact of Travel Distance on Cancer Stage at Diagnosis for Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peninah MurageFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Peter MurchieDivision of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
Max BachmannFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Michael CrawfordAiredale NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Oncology, Keighley, West Yorkshire.
Andy JonesFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have reported a survival disadvantage for rural dwellers who develop colorectal cancer, but the underlying mechanisms remain obscure. Delayed presentation to GPs may be a contributory factor, but evidence is lacking.

aimTo examine the association between rurality and travel time on diagnosis and survival of colorectal cancer in a cohort from northeast Scotland. DESIGN AND

settingThe authors used a database linking GP records to routine data for patients diagnosed between 1997 and 1998, and followed up to 2011.

methodPrimary outcomes were alarm symptoms, emergency admissions, stage, and survival. Travel time in minutes from patients to GP was estimated. Logistic and Cox regression were used to model outcomes. Interaction terms were used to determine if travelling time impacted differently on urban versus rural patients.

resultsRural patients and patients travelling farther to the GP had better 3-year survival. When the travel outcome associations were explored using interaction terms, the associations differed between rural and urban areas. Longer travel in urban areas significantly reduced the odds of emergency admissions (odds ratio [OR] 0.62,

conclusionLiving in a rural area, and travelling farther to a GP in urban areas, may reduce the likelihood of emergency admissions and poor survival. This may be related to how patients present with alarm symptoms.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareRural PopulationAgedColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services ResearchHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareProportional Hazards ModelsScotlandaccesscancer symptomsearly diagnosisgeographyprimary carerurality

Identifiers

PMID28583943
PMCPMC5565861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.