Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28583913›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Patient level cost of diabetes self-management education programmes: an international evaluation.

Gerardine Doyle, Shane O'Donnell, Etáin Quigley, Kate Cullen, Sarah Gibney, Diane Levin-Zamir, Kristin Ganahl, Gabriele Müller, Ingrid Muller, Helle Terkildsen Maindal and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gerardine DoyleUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Shane O'DonnellUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Etáin QuigleyUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Kate CullenUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Sarah GibneyUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Diane Levin-ZamirClalit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Kristin GanahlGesundheit Osterreich GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Gabriele MüllerTechnische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany.
Ingrid MullerDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Helle Terkildsen MaindalAarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Wushou Peter ChangSchool of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Stephan Van Den BrouckeUniversite catholique de Louvain, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Louvain, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to examine the value of time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) in understanding the process and costs of delivering diabetes self-management education (DSME) programmes in a multicountry comparative study.

settingOutpatient settings in five European countries (Austria, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, UK) and two countries outside Europe, Taiwan and Israel.

participantsProviders of DSME programmes across participating countries (N=16) including healthcare professionals, administrators and patients taking part in DSME programmes. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MEASURES: Primary measure: time spent by providers in the delivery of DSME and resources consumed in order to compute programme costs. Secondary measures: self-report measures of behavioural self-management and diabetes disease/health-related outcomes.

resultsWe found significant variation in costs and the processes of how DSME programmes are provided across and within countries. Variations in costs were driven by a combination of price variances, mix of personnel skill and efficiency variances. Higher cost programmes were not found to have achieved better relative outcomes. The findings highlight the value of TDABC in calculating a patient level cost and potential of the methodology to identify process improvements in guiding the optimal allocation of scarce resources in diabetes care, in particular for DSME that is often underfunded.

conclusionsThis study is the first to measure programme costs using estimates of the actual resources used to educate patients about managing their medical condition and is the first study to map such costs to self-reported behavioural and disease outcomes. The results of this study will inform clinicians, managers and policy makers seeking to enhance the delivery of DSME programmes. The findings highlight the benefits of adopting a TDABC approach to understanding the drivers of the cost of DSME programmes in a multicountry study to reveal opportunities to bend the cost curve for DSME.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresCosts and Cost AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EuropeHumansIsraelSelf-ManagementSelf ReportTaiwanTime FactorsCostHealth literacySelf-managementTime-driven activity based costing

Identifiers

PMID28583913
PMCPMC5623445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.