ArticleOphthalmology2017
Large Disparities in Receipt of Glaucoma Care between Enrollees in Medicaid and Those with Commercial Health Insurance.
Article in Ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Navigators Improve In-Office Eye Exam Adherence After Community Eye Screenings in a Randomized Clinical Trial: NYC-SIGHT Study.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Geographic Disparities in Access to Glaucoma Surgery: Lessons from a Nationwide Registry Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Association of Social Determinants of Health on Monitoring for Disease Progression Among Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Social Determinants of Uncorrected Distance and Near Visual Impairment in an Older Adult Population.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Assessment of Missing Data on Glaucoma Severity Among Participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program of the United States.Journal of glaucoma · 2025Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of Retinal Imaging Among Patients With Diabetes.JAMA ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Diagnosing glaucoma in primary eye care and the role of Artificial Intelligence applications for reducing the prevalence of undetected glaucoma in Australia.Eye (London, England) · 2024Review
- Disparities in Visual Field Testing Frequency Among Subjects With Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Social determinants of health and health disparities in glaucoma: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Exploring Underrepresentation: The Role of Diversity Statements in Ophthalmology Residency Programs.Cureus · 2024Article
- Measures of multiple deprivation and visual field loss in glaucoma clinics in England: lessons from big data.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- United States Population Disparities in Ophthalmic Care: Blindness and Visual Impairment in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).Ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Identifying, Understanding, and Addressing Disparities in Glaucoma Care in the United States.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Limited English Proficiency Is Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients Presenting for Cataract Surgery.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Observational
- Demographic and socioeconomic disparities in receipt of ophthalmology consultation for facial trauma.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Social Risk Factor Associations With Presenting Visual Acuity in Patients With Microbial Keratitis.JAMA ophthalmology · 2023Article
- The Impact of Neighborhood Factors on Physical Activity in Older Adults With Visual Impairment.American journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Disparities in Vision Health and Eye Care.Ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Longitudinal visual field variability and the ability to detect glaucoma progression in black and white individuals.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2022Observational
- Addressing Social Determinants of Vision Health.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether the type of health insurance a patient possesses and a patient's race/ethnicity affect receipt of common tests to monitor open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
designRetrospective longitudinal cohort study.
participantsA total of 21 766 persons aged ≥40 years with newly diagnosed OAG between 2007 and 2011 enrolled in Medicaid or a large United States managed care network.
methodsWe determined the proportion of patients with newly diagnosed OAG who underwent visual field (VF) testing, fundus photography (FP), other ocular imaging (OOI), or none of these tests within the first 15 months after initial OAG diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the extent by which health insurance type and race/ethnicity affected the odds of undergoing glaucoma testing.
main outcome measuresOdds ratios (OR) of undergoing VF testing, FP, OOI, or none of these tests in the 15 months after initial OAG diagnosis with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsA total of 18 372 persons with commercial health insurance and 3394 Medicaid recipients met the study inclusion criteria. The proportions of persons with commercial health insurance with newly diagnosed OAG who underwent VF, FP, and OOI were 63%, 22%, and 54%, respectively, whereas the proportions were 35%, 19%, and 30%, respectively, for Medicaid recipients. Compared with those with commercial health insurance, Medicaid recipients were 234% more likely to not receive any glaucoma testing in the 15 months after initial diagnosis (OR = 3.34; 95% CI, 3.07-3.63). After adjustment for confounders, whites with OAG enrolled in Medicaid had 198% higher odds of receiving no glaucoma testing compared with whites possessing commercial health insurance (OR = 2.98; 95% CI, 2.66-3.33). Blacks with Medicaid insurance demonstrated 291% higher odds (OR = 3.91; 95% CI, 3.40-4.49) of not receiving any glaucoma testing compared with blacks with commercial health insurance.
conclusionsIrrespective of race/ethnicity, Medicaid recipients with OAG are receiving substantially less glaucoma testing compared with persons with commercial health insurance. Disparities in testing are observed across all races/ethnicities but were most notable for blacks. These findings are particularly disconcerting because blacks are more likely than whites to go blind from OAG and there are disproportionately more blacks in Medicaid. Efforts are needed to improve the quality of glaucoma care for Medicaid recipients, especially racial minorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.