Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28583476›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2017

Dexterity: A MATLAB-based analysis software suite for processing and visualizing data from tasks that measure arm or forelimb function.

Samuel D Butensky, Andrew P Sloan, Eric Meyers, Jason B Carmel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel D ButenskyBurke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, 10605, USA. Electronic address: samuel.butensky@gmail.com.
Andrew P SloanTexas Biomedical Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA; Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA. Electronic address: drew@vulintus.com.
Eric MeyersTexas Biomedical Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA; Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA. Electronic address: ericmeyers55@gmail.com.
Jason B CarmelBurke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, 10605, USA; Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 10065, USA; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: jason.carmel@med.cornell.edu.

Funding

Motor cortex electrical stimulation to augment spontaneous recovery after chronicsubcortical strokeR01NS092875 · NINDS · WINIFRED MASTERSON BURKE MED RES INST · PI CARMEL, JASON BRANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
The knob supination task: a sensitive test of corticospinal function in the ratR03NS091737 · NINDS · WINIFRED MASTERSON BURKE MED RES INST · PI CARMEL, JASON BRANT · 2015 to 2016
$187k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092875NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS091737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHand function is critical for independence, and neurological injury often impairs dexterity. To measure hand function in people or forelimb function in animals, sensors are employed to quantify manipulation. These sensors make assessment easier and more quantitative and allow automation of these tasks. While automated tasks improve objectivity and throughput, they also produce large amounts of data that can be burdensome to analyze. We created software called Dexterity that simplifies data analysis of automated reaching tasks. NEW

methodDexterity is MATLAB software that enables quick analysis of data from forelimb tasks. Through a graphical user interface, files are loaded and data are identified and analyzed. These data can be annotated or graphed directly. Analysis is saved, and the graph and corresponding data can be exported. For additional analysis, Dexterity provides access to custom scripts created by other users.

resultsTo determine the utility of Dexterity, we performed a study to evaluate the effects of task difficulty on the degree of impairment after injury. Dexterity analyzed two months of data and allowed new users to annotate the experiment, visualize results, and save and export data easily. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Previous analysis of tasks was performed with custom data analysis, requiring expertise with analysis software. Dexterity made the tools required to analyze, visualize and annotate data easy to use by investigators without data science experience.

conclusionsDexterity increases accessibility to automated tasks that measure dexterity by making analysis of large data intuitive, robust, and efficient.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsArmForelimbHumansPsychomotor PerformanceUser-Computer InterfaceAnalysisAutomatedBehaviorManipulationReachSoftware

Identifiers

PMID28583476
PMCPMC5524998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.