Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28583196›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017

Effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait.

Christopher Schenck, Trisha M Kesar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03466372 (Innovative Biofeedback Strategies for Gait Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03466372 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Biofeedback Strategies for Gait Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2018 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsStroke, Cardiovascular, Gait, HemiplegicArmsbiofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Effects of Real-Time Haptic Feedback on Gait and Cognitive Load in Older Adults.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher SchenckDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Trisha M KesarDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, 1441 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. tkesar@emory.edu.
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Techniques DevelopmentP2CHD086844 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI THOMPSON, AIKO · 2015 to 2024
$12.7M
Cortical and spinal correlates of stroke gait rehabilitationK01HD079584 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KESAR, TRISHA · 2014 to 2018
$632k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD079584NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD086844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis, reduced push-off force generation in the paretic leg negatively impacts walking function. Gait training interventions that increase paretic push-off can improve walking function in individuals with neurologic impairment. During normal locomotion, push-off forces are modulated with variations in gait speed and slope. However, it is unknown whether able-bodied individuals can selectively modulate push-off forces from one leg in response to biofeedback. Here, in a group of young, neurologically-unimpaired individuals, we determined the effects of a real-time visual and auditory biofeedback gait training paradigm aimed at unilaterally increasing anteriorly-directed ground reaction force (AGRF) in the targeted leg.

methodsGround reaction force data during were collected from 7 able-bodied individuals as they walked at a self-selected pace on a dual-belt treadmill instrumented with force platforms. During 11-min of gait training, study participants were provided real-time AGRF biofeedback encouraging a 20-30% increase in peak AGRF generated by their right (targeted) leg compared to their baseline (pre-training) AGRF. AGRF data were collected before, during, and after the biofeedback training period, as well as during two retention tests performed without biofeedback and after standing breaks.

resultsCompared to AGRFs generated during the pre-training gait trials, participants demonstrated a significantly greater AGRF in the targeted leg during and immediately after training, indicating that biofeedback training was successful at inducing increased AGRF production in the targeted leg. Additionally, participants continued to demonstrate greater AGRF production in the targeted leg after two standing breaks, showing short-term recall of the gait pattern learned during the biofeedback training. No significant effects of training were observed on the AGRF in the non-targeted limb, showing the specificity of the effects of biofeedback toward the targeted limb.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate the short-term effects of using unilateral AGRF biofeedback to target propulsion in a specific leg, which may have utility as a training tool for individuals with gait deficits such as post-stroke hemiparesis. Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of real-time AGRF biofeedback as a gait training tool in neurologically-impaired individuals.

Indexed as

AdultBiofeedback, PsychologyFemaleGaitHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleParesisStroke RehabilitationWalkingWalking SpeedGait trainingGround reaction forcesMotor learningPropulsionReal-time biofeedbackRetentionUnilateral

Identifiers

PMID28583196
PMCPMC5460355
OpenAlexW2622956736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.