ArticleBMC genomics2017
Genome-enabled predictions for fruit weight and quality from repeated records in European peach progenies.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of transcriptome reveals key genes relating to oil quality in olive.BMC genomics · 2023Pooled it
- Multi-Season Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Loci and Candidate Genes for Fruit Quality and Maturity Traits in Peach.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Leveraging genetic resources and genomic prediction to enhance flavonol content in cranberry fruit.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Genomic prediction in Persian walnut: Optimization levers according to genetic architecture of complex traits.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Genomic prediction with kinship-based multiple kernel learning produces hypothesis on the underlying inheritance mechanisms of phenotypic traits.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Using Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping and Genomic Resources to Improve Breeding Precision in Peaches: Current Insights and Future Prospects.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Hybrid Prediction in Horticulture Crop Breeding: Progress and Challenges.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Exploring geometry of genome space via Grassmann manifolds.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Article
- Genomic selection for crop improvement in fruits and vegetables: a systematic scoping review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024Article
- Multiple-statistical genome-wide association analysis and genomic prediction of fruit aroma and agronomic traits in peaches.Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Boosting grapevine breeding for climate-smart viticulture: from genetic resources to predictive genomics.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Stacked kinship CNN vs. GBLUP for genomic predictions of additive and complex continuous phenotypes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Multi-environment genomic prediction for soluble solids content in peach (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genomic Approaches for Improvement of Tropical Fruits: Fruit Quality, Shelf Life and Nutrient Content.Genes · 2021Review
- Genomic selection and genetic gain for nut yield in an Australian macadamia breeding population.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Role of MdERF3 and MdERF118 natural variations in apple flesh firmness/crispness retainability and development of QTL-based genomics-assisted prediction.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Why and How to Switch to Genomic Selection: Lessons From Plant and Animal Breeding Experience.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genome-wide association studies for yield component traits in a macadamia breeding population.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Genomic prediction of fruit texture and training population optimization towards the application of genomic selection in apple.Horticulture research · 2020Article
- Marker-trait associations and genomic predictions of interspecific pear (Pyrus) fruit characteristics.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHighly polygenic traits such as fruit weight, sugar content and acidity strongly influence the agroeconomic value of peach varieties. Genomic Selection (GS) can accelerate peach yield and quality gain if predictions show higher levels of accuracy compared to phenotypic selection. The available IPSC 9K SNP array V1 allows standardized and highly reliable genotyping, preparing the ground for GS in peach.
resultsA repeatability model (multiple records per individual plant) for genome-enabled predictions in eleven European peach populations is presented. The analysis included 1147 individuals derived from both commercial and non-commercial peach or peach-related accessions. Considered traits were average fruit weight (FW), sugar content (SC) and titratable acidity (TA). Plants were genotyped with the 9K IPSC array, grown in three countries (France, Italy, Spain) and phenotyped for 3-5 years. An analysis of imputation accuracy of missing genotypic data was conducted using the software Beagle, showing that two of the eleven populations were highly sensitive to increasing levels of missing data. The regression model produced, for each trait and each population, estimates of heritability (FW:0.35, SC:0.48, TA:0.53, on average) and repeatability (FW:0.56, SC:0.63, TA:0.62, on average). Predictive ability was estimated in a five-fold cross validation scheme within population as the correlation of true and predicted phenotypes. Results differed by populations and traits, but predictive abilities were in general high (FW:0.60, SC:0.72, TA:0.65, on average).
conclusionsThis study assessed the feasibility of Genomic Selection in peach for highly polygenic traits linked to yield and fruit quality. The accuracy of imputing missing genotypes was as high as 96%, and the genomic predictive ability was on average 0.65, but could be as high as 0.84 for fruit weight or 0.83 for titratable acidity. The estimated repeatability may prove very useful in the management of the typical long cycles involved in peach productions. All together, these results are very promising for the application of genomic selection to peach breeding programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.