Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28583082›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Integrated QTL detection for key breeding traits in multiple peach progenies.

José R Hernández Mora, Diego Micheletti, Marco Bink, Eric Van de Weg, Celia Cantín, Nelson Nazzicari, Andrea Caprera, Maria Teresa Dettori, Sabrina Micali, Elisa Banchi and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
35.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of the Causes of Split Pit in Peaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Marker-Assisted Selection in Breeding for Fruit Trait Improvement: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Inheritance of Fruit Red-Flesh Patterns in Peach.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

José R Hernández MoraIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Agrigenòmica CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB; Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Diego MichelettiResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), Via Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
Marco BinkHendrix Genetics Research, Technology & Services B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Eric Van de WegPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Droevendaalsesteeg 1, P.O. Box 386, 6700AJ, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Celia CantínIRTA, FruitCentreParc Cientific i Tecnològic Agroalimentari de Lleida (PCiTAL), Lleida, Spain.
Nelson NazzicariPTP Science Park, Via Einstein, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Andrea CapreraPTP Science Park, Via Einstein, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Maria Teresa DettoriConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria (CREA) - Centro di Ricerca per la Frutticoltura, 00134, Roma, Italy.
Sabrina MicaliConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria (CREA) - Centro di Ricerca per la Frutticoltura, 00134, Roma, Italy.
Elisa BanchiResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), Via Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
José Antonio CampoyBFP, INRA, 33140, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Elisabeth DirlewangerBFP, INRA, 33140, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Patrick LambertGAFL, INRA, 84140, Montfavet, France.
Thierry PascalGAFL, INRA, 84140, Montfavet, France.
Michela TroggioResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), Via Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy.
Daniele BassiUniversità degli Studi di Milano, DiSAA, Via Celoria 2, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Laura RossiniPTP Science Park, Via Einstein, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Ignazio VerdeConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria (CREA) - Centro di Ricerca per la Frutticoltura, 00134, Roma, Italy.
Bénédicte Quilot-TurionGAFL, INRA, 84140, Montfavet, France.
François LaurensIRHS, INRA, SFR 4207 QuaSaV, 49071, Beaucouze, France.
Pere ArúsIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Agrigenòmica CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB; Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria José AranzanaIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Agrigenòmica CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB; Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain. mariajose.aranzana@irta.cat.ORCID 0000-0002-0240-8021
Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications · ESFondazione Edmund Mach · ITGénétique et amélioration des fruits et légumes · FRBiologie du Fruit et Pathologie · FRParco Tecnologico Padano · ITUniversity of Milan · ITHendrix Genetics (Netherlands) · NLInstitut de Recherche en Horticulture et Semences · FRWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) is a major temperate fruit crop with an intense breeding activity. Breeding is facilitated by knowledge of the inheritance of the key traits that are often of a quantitative nature. QTLs have traditionally been studied using the phenotype of a single progeny (usually a full-sib progeny) and the correlation with a set of markers covering its genome. This approach has allowed the identification of various genes and QTLs but is limited by the small numbers of individuals used and by the narrow transect of the variability analyzed. In this article we propose the use of a multi-progeny mapping strategy that used pedigree information and Bayesian approaches that supports a more precise and complete survey of the available genetic variability.

resultsSeven key agronomic characters (data from 1 to 3 years) were analyzed in 18 progenies from crosses between occidental commercial genotypes and various exotic lines including accessions of other Prunus species. A total of 1467 plants from these progenies were genotyped with a 9 k SNP array. Forty-seven QTLs were identified, 22 coinciding with major genes and QTLs that have been consistently found in the same populations when studied individually and 25 were new. A substantial part of the QTLs observed (47%) would not have been detected in crosses between only commercial materials, showing the high value of exotic lines as a source of novel alleles for the commercial gene pool. Our strategy also provided estimations on the narrow sense heritability of each character, and the estimation of the QTL genotypes of each parent for the different QTLs and their breeding value.

conclusionsThe integrated strategy used provides a broader and more accurate picture of the variability available for peach breeding with the identification of many new QTLs, information on the sources of the alleles of interest and the breeding values of the potential donors of such valuable alleles. These results are first-hand information for breeders and a step forward towards the implementation of DNA-informed strategies to facilitate selection of new cultivars with improved productivity and quality.

Indexed as

BreedingFlowersFruitGenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideProbabilityPrunus persicaQuantitative Trait LociSolubilityFlexQTLTMPBAPeach breedingPeach QTLPedigre-based Analysis

Identifiers

PMID28583082
PMCPMC5460339
OpenAlexW2618879430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.