ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2017
Limitations in the use of 18F-FDG PET in the pre-operative staging of gastric cancer: A case series.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Usefulness of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Genomic Characteristics and Treatment Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPositron emission tomography (PET) is a mainstay in the preoperative evaluation of various cancers. In gastric cancer however, its role in the initial staging remains contentious. Presented is a case series of three gastric patients wherein the use of fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT (computer tomography) as part of the initial staging was inconsequential to treatment, demonstrating its limited role in the staging of primary gastric cancer.
methodsWe analyzed retrospective data from 12/1/2010 to 10/31/2016 of patient with gastric cancer whose initial staging included a PET/CT. Only patients 18 years and older with gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers were included. The data was derived from a single institution. Management of patients involved both an academic institution and a community practice.
resultsOf the three cases reported, an FDG-avid mass with minimal FDG uptake was reported in a single case and no FDG-avid lesion was reported in the other two. Neither of the patients underwent an endoscopic ultrasound for lack of availability.
conclusionWhile various imaging studies such as endoscopic ultrasound have an established role in the initial staging, the role of FDG-PET is yet to be established and its routine use remains contentious. Based on our clinical experience and review of the literature, we believe FDG-PET/CT imaging is of limited clinical and cost effective value in the initial staging workup of gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.