Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28582570›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2017

Phase II Proof-of-Concept Trial of the Orexin Receptor Antagonist Filorexant (MK-6096) in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Kathryn M Connor, Paulette Ceesay, Jill Hutzelmann, Duane Snavely, Andrew D Krystal, Madhukar H Trivedi, Michael Thase, Christopher Lines, W Joseph Herring, David Michelson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01554176 (A Phase IIa, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-6096 for Treatment Augmentation in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01554176 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase IIa, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-6096 for Treatment Augmentation in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2012 to 2013Enrolled129ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder, RecurrentArmsFilorexant, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Orexin Receptor Antagonists and Insomnia.Current psychiatry reports · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Sleep therapeutics and neuropsychiatric illness.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  15. An Update on Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonists and Their Potential Role in Insomnia Therapeutics.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn M ConnorMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
Paulette CeesayMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
Jill HutzelmannMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
Duane SnavelyMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
Andrew D KrystalMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
Madhukar H TrivediMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
Michael ThaseMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
Christopher LinesMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
W Joseph HerringMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
David MichelsonMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (Dr. Connor, Dr. Ceesay, Ms. Hutzelmann, Mr. Snavely, Dr. Lines, Dr. Herring, and Dr. Michelson); Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Krystal); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Dr. Trivedi); University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Thase).
Duke University Hospital · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the orexin receptor antagonist filorexant (MK-6096) for treatment augmentation in patients with major depressive disorder. Methods: We conducted a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase II, proof-of-concept study. Patients with major depressive disorder (partial responders to ongoing antidepressant therapy) were randomized 1:1 to once-daily oral filorexant 10 mg or matching placebo. Results: Due to enrollment challenges, the study was terminated early, resulting in insufficient statistical power to detect a prespecified treatment difference; of 326 patients planned, 129 (40%) were randomized and 128 took treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of change from baseline to week 6 in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score; the estimated treatment difference for filorexant-placebo was -0.7 (with negative values favoring filorexant) (P=.679). The most common adverse events were somnolence and suicidal ideation. Conclusions: The interpretation of the results is limited by the enrollment, which was less than originally planned, but the available data do not suggest efficacy of orexin receptor antagonism with filorexant for the treatment of depression. (Clinical Trial Registry: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01554176).

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedOrexin Receptor AntagonistsPiperidinesProof of Concept StudyPyrimidinesTreatment FailureYoung AdultAntidepressive AgentsMK-6096Orexin Receptor AntagonistsPiperidinesPyrimidinesdepressionfilorexantMK-6096orexin receptor antagonist

Identifiers

PMID28582570
PMCPMC5570043
OpenAlexW2621005620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.