ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017
Serum Bactericidal Antibody Responses of Students Immunized With a Meningococcal Serogroup B Vaccine in Response to an Outbreak on a University Campus.
Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meningococcal Vaccination: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2020.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2020Guideline
- Trial
- Next-Generation Strategies to Encounter Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): From Lariocidin to Gene Editing and Nanotechnology-Based Approaches.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Combination Native Outer Membrane Vesicle (NOVM) Vaccine to Prevent Meningococcal and Gonococcal Disease.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Serum bactericidal activity against circulating and reference strains of meningococcal serogroup B in the United States: A review of the strain coverage of meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccines in adolescents and young adults.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Review
- Meningococcal B Immunisation in Adults and Potential Broader Immunisation Strategies: A Narrative Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2023Review
- Effectiveness of a serogroup B outer membrane vesicle meningococcal vaccine against gonorrhoea: a retrospective observational study.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2022Observational
- Vaccine Candidates for the Control and Prevention of the Sexually Transmitted Disease Gonorrhea.Vaccines · 2021Review
- Vaccines against Meningococcal Diseases.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
- Fatal Nongroupable Neisseria meningitidis Disease in Vaccinated Patient Receiving Eculizumab.Emerging infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Breadth and Duration of Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Activity in Health Care Workers and Microbiologists Immunized with the MenB-FHbp Vaccine.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: MenB-4C is a recently licensed meningococcal serogroup B vaccine. For vaccine licensure, short-term efficacy was inferred from serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titers against 3 antigen-specific indicator strains, which are not necessarily representative of US disease-causing strains. Methods: A total of 4923 students were immunized with MenB-4C in response to an outbreak at a university. Serum samples were obtained at 1.5-2 months from 106 students who received the recommended 2 doses and 52 unvaccinated students. Follow-up serum samples were obtained at 7 months from 42 vaccinated and 24 unvaccinated participants. SBA was measured against strains from 4 university outbreaks. Results: At 1.5-2 months, the proportion of immunized students with protective titers ≥1:4 against an isolate from the campus outbreak was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87%-97%) vs 37% (95% CI, 24%-51%) in unvaccinated students. The proportion with protective titers against strains from 3 other university outbreaks was 73% (95% CI, 62%-82%) vs 26% (95% CI, 14%-41%) in unvaccinated; 71% (95% CI, 61%-79%) vs 19% (95% CI, 10%-33%) in unvaccinated; and 53% (95% CI, 42%-64%) vs 9% (95% CI, 3%-22%) in unvaccinated (P < .0001 for each strain). At 7 months, the proportion of immunized students with titers ≥1:4 was 86% (95% CI, 71%-95%) against the isolate from the campus outbreak and 57% (95% CI, 41%-72%), 38% (95% CI, 24%-54%), and 31% (95% CI, 18%-47%), respectively, for the other 3 outbreak strains. Conclusions: MenB-4C elicited short-term protective titers against 4 strains responsible for recent university campus outbreaks. By 7 months the prevalence of protective titers was <40% for 2 of the 4 outbreak strains. A booster dose of MenB-4C may be needed to maintain protective titers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.