Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28582542›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Serum Bactericidal Antibody Responses of Students Immunized With a Meningococcal Serogroup B Vaccine in Response to an Outbreak on a University Campus.

Eduardo Lujan, Kathleen Winter, Jillandra Rovaris, Qin Liu, Dan M Granoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Meningococcal Vaccination: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2020.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eduardo LujanCenter for Immunobiology and Vaccine Development, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland.
Kathleen WinterImmunization Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, and.
Jillandra RovarisCowell Center, Santa Clara University, California; and.
Qin LiuWistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dan M GranoffCenter for Immunobiology and Vaccine Development, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland.

Funding

Novel vaccine strategies for prevention of N. meningitidis group B diseaseR01AI046464 · NIAID · OMVAX, INC. · PI MOE, GREGORY ROBERT · 2000 to 2024
$12.1M
The effect of binding of fH to meningococcal fHbp vaccine on antibody protectionR01AI114701 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RES CTR AT OAKLAND · PI BEERNINK, PETER T. · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
CONSTRUCTION OF THE VACCINE CENTERC06RR016226 · NCRR · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL &RES CTR AT OAKLAND · PI LUCAS, ALEXANDER H. · 2002 to 2002
$2.0M
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR016226NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI046464NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: MenB-4C is a recently licensed meningococcal serogroup B vaccine. For vaccine licensure, short-term efficacy was inferred from serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titers against 3 antigen-specific indicator strains, which are not necessarily representative of US disease-causing strains. Methods: A total of 4923 students were immunized with MenB-4C in response to an outbreak at a university. Serum samples were obtained at 1.5-2 months from 106 students who received the recommended 2 doses and 52 unvaccinated students. Follow-up serum samples were obtained at 7 months from 42 vaccinated and 24 unvaccinated participants. SBA was measured against strains from 4 university outbreaks. Results: At 1.5-2 months, the proportion of immunized students with protective titers ≥1:4 against an isolate from the campus outbreak was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87%-97%) vs 37% (95% CI, 24%-51%) in unvaccinated students. The proportion with protective titers against strains from 3 other university outbreaks was 73% (95% CI, 62%-82%) vs 26% (95% CI, 14%-41%) in unvaccinated; 71% (95% CI, 61%-79%) vs 19% (95% CI, 10%-33%) in unvaccinated; and 53% (95% CI, 42%-64%) vs 9% (95% CI, 3%-22%) in unvaccinated (P < .0001 for each strain). At 7 months, the proportion of immunized students with titers ≥1:4 was 86% (95% CI, 71%-95%) against the isolate from the campus outbreak and 57% (95% CI, 41%-72%), 38% (95% CI, 24%-54%), and 31% (95% CI, 18%-47%), respectively, for the other 3 outbreak strains. Conclusions: MenB-4C elicited short-term protective titers against 4 strains responsible for recent university campus outbreaks. By 7 months the prevalence of protective titers was <40% for 2 of the 4 outbreak strains. A booster dose of MenB-4C may be needed to maintain protective titers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialAntibody FormationAntigens, BacterialBlood Bactericidal ActivityDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansImmunizationMaleMeningococcal InfectionsMeningococcal VaccinesNeisseria meningitidis, Serogroup BSerogroupStudentsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialMeningococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID28582542
PMCPMC5850644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.