ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Dynamic metabolic modeling of heterotrophic and mixotrophic microalgal growth on fermentative wastes.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feast-Famine in Cyclic Autotrophy/Heterotrophy Doubles Microalgal Productivity while Controlling Bacterial Contamination.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2025Article
- Combination of Exhaust Gas Fermentation Effluent and Dairy Wastewater for Microalgae Production: Effect on Growth and FAME Composition ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Biochar-based composites for removing chlorinated organic pollutants: Applications, mechanisms, and perspectives.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2024Review
- Mixotrophic Growth ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Twelve quick tips for designing sound dynamical models for bioprocesses.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Two-Stage Cultivation of Dunaliella tertiolecta with Glycerol and Triethylamine for Lipid Accumulation: a Viable Way To Alleviate the Inhibitory Effect of Triethylamine on Biomass.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Microalgae and cyanobacteria modeling in water resource recovery facilities: A critical review.Water research X · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microalgae are promising microorganisms for the production of numerous molecules of interest, such as pigments, proteins or triglycerides that can be turned into biofuels. Heterotrophic or mixotrophic growth on fermentative wastes represents an interesting approach to achieving higher biomass concentrations, while reducing cost and improving the environmental footprint. Fermentative wastes generally consist of a blend of diverse molecules and it is thus crucial to understand microalgal metabolism in such conditions, where switching between substrates might occur. Metabolic modeling has proven to be an efficient tool for understanding metabolism and guiding the optimization of biomass or target molecule production. Here, we focused on the metabolism of Chlorella sorokiniana growing heterotrophically and mixotrophically on acetate and butyrate. The metabolism was represented by 172 metabolic reactions. The DRUM modeling framework with a mildly relaxed quasi-steady-state assumption was used to account for the switching between substrates and the presence of light. Nine experiments were used to calibrate the model and nine experiments for the validation. The model efficiently predicted the experimental data, including the transient behavior during heterotrophic, autotrophic, mixotrophic and diauxic growth. It shows that an accurate model of metabolism can now be constructed, even in dynamic conditions, with the presence of several carbon substrates. It also opens new perspectives for the heterotrophic and mixotrophic use of microalgae, especially for biofuel production from wastes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.