ArticlePloS one2017
In vivo MR-angiography for the assessment of aortic aneurysms in an experimental mouse model on a clinical MRI scanner: Comparison with high-frequency ultrasound and histology.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analysis of Micro-Computed Tomography and 3D Micro-Ultrasound for Measurement of the Mouse Aorta.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- High-Frequency Three-Dimensional Lumen Volume Ultrasound Is a Sensitive Method to Detect Early Aneurysmal Change in Elastase-Induced Murine Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMR-angiography currently represents one of the clinical reference-standards for the assessment of aortic-dimensions. For experimental research in mice, dedicated preclinical high-field MRI scanners are used in most studies. This type of MRI scanner is not available in most institutions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of MR-angiography performed on a clinical MR scanner for the assessment of aortic aneurysms in an experimental mouse model, compared to a preclinical high-resolution ultrasound imaging system and histopathology.
methodsAll in vivo MR imaging was performed with a clinical 3T MRI system (Philips Achieva) equipped with a clinical gradient system in combination with a single-loop surface-coil (47 mm). All MR sequences were based on clinically used sequences. For ultrasound, a dedicated preclinical high-resolution system (30 MHz linear transducer, Vevo770, VisualSonics) was used. All imaging was performed with an ApoE knockout mouse-model for aortic aneurysms. Histopathology was performed as reference-standard at all stages of aneurysm development.
resultsMR-angiography on a clinical 3T system enabled the clear visualization of the aortic lumen and aneurysmal dilation at different stages of aneurysm development. A close correlation (R2 = 0.98; p < 0.001) with histological area measurements was found. Additionally, a good agreement between MR and ultrasound area measurements in systole (R2 = 0.91; p < 0.001) and diastole (R2 = 0.94; p < 0.001) were measured. Regarding interobserver reproducibility, MRI measurements yielded a smaller 95% confidence interval and a closer interreader correlation compared to ultrasound measurements (-0.37-0.46; R2 = 0.97 vs. -0.78-0.88; R2 = 0.87).
conclusionThis study demonstrates that MR-angiography, performed on a clinical 3T MR scanner, enables the reliable detection and quantification of the aortic dilatation at different stages of aneurysm development in an experimental mouse model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.