Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28581379›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2017

Bottleneck analysis at district level to illustrate gaps within the district health system in Uganda.

Dorcus Kiwanuka Henriksson, Mio Fredriksson, Peter Waiswa, Katarina Selling, Stefan Swartling Peterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Acceptability and barriers to rapid HIV/syphilis testing among pregnant Wayuu women in Colombia: A cross-sectional pragmatic study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorcus Kiwanuka Henrikssona Institution of International Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2359-9891
Mio Fredrikssonc Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-3454
Peter Waiswab Department of Public Health Sciences , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Katarina Sellinga Institution of International Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8036-168X
Stefan Swartling Petersona Institution of International Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7203-3096
Uppsala University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor quality of care and access to effective and affordable interventions have been attributed to constraints and bottlenecks within and outside the health system. However, there is limited understanding of health system barriers to utilization and delivery of appropriate, high-impact, and cost-effective interventions at the point of service delivery in districts and sub-districts in low-income countries. In this study we illustrate the use of the bottleneck analysis approach, which could be used to identify bottlenecks in service delivery within the district health system.

methodsA modified Tanahashi model with six determinants for effective coverage was used to determine bottlenecks in service provision for maternal and newborn care. The following interventions provided during antenatal care were used as tracer interventions: use of iron and folic acid, intermittent presumptive treatment for malaria, HIV counseling and testing, and syphilis testing. Data from cross-sectional household and health facility surveys in Mayuge and Namayingo districts in Uganda were used in this study.

resultsEffective coverage and human resource gaps were identified as the biggest bottlenecks in both districts, with coverage ranging from 0% to 66% for effective coverage and from 46% to 58% for availability of health facility staff. Our findings revealed a similar pattern in bottlenecks in both districts for particular interventions although the districts are functionally independent.

conclusionThe modified Tanahashi model is an analysis tool that can be used to identify bottlenecks to effective coverage within the district health system, for instance, the effective coverage for maternal and newborn care interventions. However, the analysis is highly dependent on the availability of data to populate all six determinants and could benefit from further validation analysis for the causes of bottlenecks identified.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Health ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleGovernment ProgramsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyPrenatal CareUgandabottleneck analysisdemand-side determinantsdistrict health systemsmaternal and newborn caresupply-side determinantsTanahashi model

Identifiers

PMID28581379
PMCPMC5496050
OpenAlexW2621140274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.