ArticleNature communications2017
Correspondence: DNA shape is insufficient to explain binding.
Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A phenotypic drug discovery approach by latent interaction in deep learning.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- ChEC-seq2: an improved chromatin endogenous cleavage sequencing method and bioinformatic analysis pipeline for mapping in vivo protein-DNA interactions.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- ChEC-seq2: an improved Chromatin Endogenous Cleavage sequencing method and bioinformatic analysis pipeline for mappingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- High-Resolution Genome-Wide Occupancy inmSphere · 2020Article
- Prediction of regulatory motifs from human Chip-sequencing data using a deep learning framework.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- DNA Motif Recognition Modeling from Protein Sequences.iScience · 2018Article
- Genome-wide determinants of sequence-specific DNA binding of general regulatory factors.Genome research · 2018Article
- Correspondence: Reply to 'DNA shape is insufficient to explain binding'.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Correspondence: DNA shape is insufficient to explain binding.Nature communications · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.