Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28580687›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2017

Theta- and delta-band EEG network dynamics during a novelty oddball task.

Jeremy Harper, Stephen M Malone, William G Iacono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeremy HarperDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-6879
Stephen M MaloneDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
William G IaconoDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Adult consequences of youth substance use: Twin study enriched for SUD riskR01DA036216 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI IACONO, WILLIAM G. · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the P3 component during target detection and novelty processing has been widely studied, less is known about its underlying network dynamics. A recent cognitive model suggests that frontal-parietal and frontal-temporal interregional connectivity are related to attention/action selection and target-related memory updating during the P3, respectively, but empirical work testing this model is lacking. Other work suggests the importance of theta- and delta-band connectivity between the medial frontal cortex and distributed cortical regions during attention, stimulus detection, and response selection processes, and similar dynamics may underlie P3-related network connectivity. The present study evaluated the functional connectivity elicited during a visual task, which combined oddball target and novelty stimuli, in a sample of 231 same-sex twins. It was hypothesized that both target and novel conditions would involve theta frontoparietal connectivity and medial frontal theta power, but that target stimuli would elicit the strongest frontotemporal connectivity. EEG time-frequency analysis revealed greater theta-band frontoparietal connectivity and medial frontal power during both target and novel conditions compared to standards, which may index conflict/uncertainty resolution processes. Theta-band frontotemporal connectivity was maximal during the target condition, potentially reflecting context updating or stimulus-response activation. Delta-band frontocentral-parietal connectivity was also strongest following targets, which may be sensitive to response-related demands. These results suggest the existence of functional networks related to P3 that are differentially engaged by target oddballs and novel distractors. Compared to simple P3 amplitude, network measures may provide a more nuanced view of the neural dynamics during target detection/novelty processing in normative and pathological populations.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionDelta RhythmElectroencephalographyFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleNerve NetNeuropsychological TestsParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTheta RhythmTwinsYoung Adultfunctional connectivitynoveltyoddballP3thetatime-frequency analysis

Identifiers

PMID28580687
PMCPMC5638675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.