Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28580630›Full record

ArticleCellular microbiology2017

The midgut microbiota plays an essential role in sand fly vector competence for Leishmania major.

Isabelle Louradour, Carolina Cunha Monteiro, Ehud Inbar, Kashinath Ghosh, Richard Merkhofer, Phillip Lawyer, Andrea Paun, Margery Smelkinson, Nagila Secundino, Michael Lewis and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can floral nectars reduce transmission of Leishmania?PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Circulation aspects of phlebotomines (Diptera:Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative Gut Proteome ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microbiota in disease-transmitting vectors.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Isabelle LouradourLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Carolina Cunha MonteiroLaboratory of Medical Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ehud InbarLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kashinath GhoshLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Richard MerkhoferLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Phillip LawyerLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Andrea PaunLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Margery SmelkinsonBiological Imaging Section, Research Technologies Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nagila SecundinoLaboratory of Medical Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Michael LewisDepartment of Pathogen Molecular Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Dinesh ErramDepartment of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Ludek ZurekDepartment of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
David SacksLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-3124
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRKansas State University · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Infectious Diseases Research Technologies Core - BethesdaZICAI001051 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CHERRY, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$226.1M
Vector Biological Studies in LeishmaniasisZIAAI000256 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI SACKS, DAVID · 2009 to 2025
$12.5M
Vector Biological Studies in LeishmaniasisZ01AI000256 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI SACKS, DAVID · 1985 to 2008
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AI000256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many arthropod vectors, the diverse bacteria and fungi that inhabit the gut can negatively impact pathogen colonization. Our attempts to exploit antibiotic treatment of colonized Phlebotomus duboscqi sand flies in order to improve their vector competency for Leishmania major resulted instead in flies that were refractory to the development of transmissible infections due to the inability of the parasite to survive and to colonize the anterior midgut with infective, metacyclic stage promastigotes. The parasite survival and development defect could be overcome by feeding the flies on different symbiont bacteria but not by feeding them on bacterial supernatants or replete medium. The inhibitory effect of the dysbiosis was moderated by lowering the concentration of sucrose (<30% w/v) used in the sugar feeds to maintain the colony. Exposure of promastigotes to 30% sucrose was lethal to the parasite in vitro. Confocal imaging revealed that the killing in vivo was confined to promastigotes that had migrated to the anterior plug region, corresponding to the highest concentrations of sucrose. The data suggest that sucrose utilization by the microbiota is essential to promote the appropriate osmotic conditions required for the survival of infective stage promastigotes in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsInsect VectorsLeishmania majorMicrobiotaOsmotic PressurePhlebotomusPsychodidaeSucroseSucroseLeishmaniamicrobiotaosmotic stresssand fliesvector competence

Identifiers

PMID28580630
PMCPMC5587349
OpenAlexW2623345360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.