Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28580535›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2017

Metabolically inactive insulin: friend or foe in the prevention of autoimmune diabetes?

Mikael Knip

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults in China.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikael KnipChildren's Hospital, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 22, (Stenbäckinkatu 11), 00014, Helsinki, Finland. mikael.knip@helsinki.fi.
Helsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 20 years ago an American study suggested that daily subcutaneous injections of a metabolically inactive insulin analogue with a single amino acid substitution (aspartic acid instead of phenylalanine) at position 25 of the B chain was as effective as intact insulin in preventing autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. In this issue of Diabetologia Grönholm et al (DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4276-5 ) report that parenteral administration of the same insulin analogue has no preventive effect whatsoever on the development of diabetes in NOD mice; in fact, high doses of the metabolically inactive insulin accelerated disease development. The authors were also unable to show any tolerogenic effect of an insulin peptide mimetope given via a subcutaneous osmotic pump. These data do not support the use of metabolically inactive insulin for the prevention of autoimmune diabetes and question whether insulin alone, intact or inactivated has any role in preventing progression to symptomatic diabetes. Future and ongoing intervention trials in humans with preclinical type 1 diabetes should indicate whether the administration of oral insulin has any protective, neutral or even predisposing effects on the development of symptomatic diabetes.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsAutoantibodiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMiceMice, Inbred NODAutoantibodiesHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinAutoimmune diabetesInsulinPreventionTolerance

Identifiers

PMID28580535
OpenAlexW2620600171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.