Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28580514›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2017

Complete protection against cryodamage of cryopreserved whole bovine and human ovaries using DMSO as a cryoprotectant.

Johan R Westphal, Renne Gerritse, Didi D M Braat, Catharina C M Beerendonk, Ronald Peek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Dimethyl Sulfoxide is Less Effective in Immersing Cryopreserved Large Pieces of Tissue: A Rabbit Hind-Limb Model.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johan R WestphalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Renne GerritseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Didi D M BraatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Catharina C M BeerendonkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ronald PeekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Ronald.Peek@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-3371
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to determine the optimal cryopreservation protocol for whole ovaries intended for preservation of fertility in women.

methodsWe investigated the optimal cryopreservation procedure for whole ovaries in a bovine model. The following parameters were investigated to determine their effect on ovarian tissue viability: type of cryoprotectant, administration route of the cryoprotectant (perfusion and/or submersion), and the maximum tolerable interval between death of the animal and start of the cryopreservation process. The resulting optimal cryopreservation procedure for bovine ovaries was subsequently tested on human ovaries. In vitro glucose uptake, histology, and immunohistochemistry were used to assess the integrity of the ovarian tissue.

resultsStarting the cryopreservation procedure (including perfusion with and submersion in DMSO) within 10-15 min after death of the animal proved critical, resulting in a 90-100% protection level against cryodamage. When cryopreserving human ovaries using the same protocol, over 95% protection against cryodamage was observed on all tissue levels. In addition, no apparent morphological damage to either the follicles or the vascular endothelium was observed.

conclusionOur findings suggest that using the optimized protocol presented in this paper allows good cryopreservation of whole human ovaries and represents an important step in considering whole ovary autotransplantation for clinically applied fertility preservation.

Indexed as

CryopreservationAnimalsCattleCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideEndothelium, VascularFemaleFertility PreservationHumansOvarian FollicleOvaryCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideBovineCryopreservationHumanIschemiaWhole ovary

Identifiers

PMID28580514
PMCPMC5581782
OpenAlexW2621150861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.