Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28580415›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2017

KID Project: an internet-based digital video atlas of capsule endoscopy for research purposes.

Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Dimitris K Iakovidis, Diana E Yung, Emanuele Rondonotti, Uri Kopylov, John N Plevris, Ervin Toth, Abraham Eliakim, Gabrielle Wurm Johansson, Wojciech Marlicz and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. eNCApsulate: neural cellular automata for precision diagnosis on capsule endoscopes.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gastrointestinal tract disease detection via deep learning based structural and statistical features optimized hexa-classification model.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Video Capsule Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anastasios KoulaouzidisCentre for Liver and Digestive Disorders, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Dimitris K IakovidisUniversity of Thessaly, Department of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, Volos, Thessaly, Greece.
Diana E YungCentre for Liver and Digestive Disorders, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Emanuele RondonottiGastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.
Uri KopylovDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
John N PlevrisCentre for Liver and Digestive Disorders, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ervin TothDepartment of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Abraham EliakimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Gabrielle Wurm JohanssonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Wojciech MarliczDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szezecin, Poland.
Georgios MavrogenisGastroenterology and Endoscopy Center of Mytilene, Mytilene, Lesvos, Greece.
Artur NemethDepartment of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Henrik ThorlaciusDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Gian Eugenio TontiniGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCapsule endoscopy (CE) has revolutionized small-bowel (SB) investigation. Computational methods can enhance diagnostic yield (DY); however, incorporating machine learning algorithms (MLAs) into CE reading is difficult as large amounts of image annotations are required for training. Current databases lack graphic annotations of pathologies and cannot be used. A novel database, KID, aims to provide a reference for research and development of medical decision support systems (MDSS) for CE.

methodsOpen-source software was used for the KID database. Clinicians contribute anonymized, annotated CE images and videos. Graphic annotations are supported by an open-access annotation tool (Ratsnake). We detail an experiment based on the KID database, examining differences in SB lesion measurement between human readers and a MLA. The Jaccard Index (JI) was used to evaluate similarity between annotations by the MLA and human readers.

resultsThe MLA performed best in measuring lymphangiectasias with a JI of 81 ± 6 %. The other lesion types were: angioectasias (JI 64 ± 11 %), aphthae (JI 64 ± 8 %), chylous cysts (JI 70 ± 14 %), polypoid lesions (JI 75 ± 21 %), and ulcers (JI 56 ± 9 %).

conclusionMLA can perform as well as human readers in the measurement of SB angioectasias in white light (WL). Automated lesion measurement is therefore feasible. KID is currently the only open-source CE database developed specifically to aid development of MDSS. Our experiment demonstrates this potential.

Identifiers

PMID28580415
PMCPMC5452962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.