ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2017
Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients over 80 years of age: the morbidity outcomes.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Pooled it
- More than 30 Years of POSSUM: Are Scoring Systems Still Relevant Today for Colorectal Surgery?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The impact of assistants' reverse alignment surgical skill proficiency on laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Annals of coloproctology · 2022Article
- Colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients 80 years and older: a comparison with younger age groups.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Perioperative and oncologic outcomes in young and octogenarian patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison at the extremes.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Nutritional status and its effect on complications in patients with colorectal cancer.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2020Article
- Effect of Age on Laparoscopic Surgery and Postoperative Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer.Annals of coloproctology · 2020Article
- Minimally invasive surgery in the geriatric patient with colon cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Review
- Comparison of a Five-Year Survival and Cancer Recurrence between Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colonic Resections due to Adenocarcinoma-a Single Centre Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Preoperative radiation as part of a multidisciplinary strategy for a medically inoperable patient with a bleeding colon cancer.BMJ case reports · 2019Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery in colon cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Observational
- Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients.Annals of coloproctology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between patients under 60 years of age and older patients over 80 years of age who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery with colorectal cancer.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 519 colorectal patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma between January 2007 and December 2012 was collected and categorized into 2 groups of patients, those under 60 years of age (n = 404) and those over 80 years of age (n = 115).
resultsThe group of patients over 80 years of age had a significantly higher ASA physical status classification (P < 0.001), more preoperative comorbidities (P < 0.001), had a tendency towards more tumors in a colonic location (P = 0.034), and more advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage (P = 0.001). A higher proportion of right hemicolectomy and abdominoperineal resection was performed and more transfusions were required in the group of patients over 80 years of age (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in operative time, conversion rate, resection margins, and numbers of harvested lymph nodes, hospital stay, and morbidity between the 2 groups. No postoperative mortality was found in the present study. The 3-year DFS for over 80 years age group and under 60 years age group were 73.5% and 73.9%, respectively (P = 0.770).
conclusionLaparoscopic colorectal surgery was effective and safe for elderly patients over 80 years of age and resulted in postoperative outcomes similar to those in younger patients. The postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery was not increased in over 80 years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.