Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28580297›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2017

Comparison of natural and artificial odor lures for nilgai (

John A Goolsby, Nirbhay K Singh, Alfonso Ortega-S, David G Hewitt, Tyler A Campbell, David Wester, Adalberto A Pérez de León

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Leveraging location intelligence and individual-based modeling to simulateCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John A GoolsbyUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Cattle Fever Tick Research Laboratory, 22675 N. Moorefield Rd, Edinburg, TX 78541, United States.
Nirbhay K SinghUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Cattle Fever Tick Research Laboratory, 22675 N. Moorefield Rd, Edinburg, TX 78541, United States.
Alfonso Ortega-SEast Foundation, 200 Concord Plaza Drive, Suite 410, San Antonio, TX 78216, United States.
David G HewittCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, 700 University Blvd, Kingsville, TX 78363, United States.
Tyler A CampbellEast Foundation, 200 Concord Plaza Drive, Suite 410, San Antonio, TX 78216, United States.
David WesterCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, 700 University Blvd, Kingsville, TX 78363, United States.
Adalberto A Pérez de LeónUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory and Veterinary Pest Genomics Center, 2700 Fredericksburg Rd., Kerrville, TX 78028, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle fever ticks (CFT), vectors of bovine babesiosis and anaplasmosis, were eradicated from the United States by 1943, but are frequently reintroduced from neighboring border states of Mexico via stray cattle and wildlife hosts including white-tailed deer (

Indexed as

Bovine babesiosisCattle fever tick eradication programTransboundary disease managementWildlife disease vectors

Identifiers

PMID28580297
PMCPMC5447508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.